fix(multicall): resolve critical multicall parsing corruption issues
- Added comprehensive bounds checking to prevent buffer overruns in multicall parsing - Implemented graduated validation system (Strict/Moderate/Permissive) to reduce false positives - Added LRU caching system for address validation with 10-minute TTL - Enhanced ABI decoder with missing Universal Router and Arbitrum-specific DEX signatures - Fixed duplicate function declarations and import conflicts across multiple files - Added error recovery mechanisms with multiple fallback strategies - Updated tests to handle new validation behavior for suspicious addresses - Fixed parser test expectations for improved validation system - Applied gofmt formatting fixes to ensure code style compliance - Fixed mutex copying issues in monitoring package by introducing MetricsSnapshot - Resolved critical security vulnerabilities in heuristic address extraction - Progress: Updated TODO audit from 10% to 35% complete 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
93
docs/master-plan/09-cross-exchange-arbitrage.md
Normal file
93
docs/master-plan/09-cross-exchange-arbitrage.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
# Cross-Exchange Arbitrage Integration Plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This document outlines the implementation plan for identifying and executing cross-exchange arbitrage opportunities in the MEV bot. This involves finding price differences between exchanges for the same asset pair and executing profitable trades.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Components
|
||||
|
||||
### Opportunity Detection
|
||||
- Real-time price monitoring across exchanges
|
||||
- Latency-optimized price feeds
|
||||
- Cross-exchange comparison algorithms
|
||||
- Profit calculation considering gas costs
|
||||
|
||||
### Supported Arbitrage Types
|
||||
- Direct arbitrage (A→B on exchange 1, B→A on exchange 2)
|
||||
- Triangle arbitrage (A→B→C→A across multiple exchanges)
|
||||
- Multi-hop arbitrage (complex routing across multiple exchanges)
|
||||
- Cross-chain arbitrage (same token on different chains)
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Strategies
|
||||
- Atomic arbitrage (single transaction)
|
||||
- Multi-transaction arbitrage
|
||||
- Sandwich-resistant arbitrage
|
||||
- Gas-optimized execution
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create Arbitrage struct for opportunity detection and execution
|
||||
2. Implement real-time price monitoring across exchanges
|
||||
3. Develop latency-optimized price comparison functions
|
||||
4. Add gas cost estimation for arbitrage transactions
|
||||
5. Implement atomic arbitrage execution
|
||||
6. Create multi-transaction arbitrage strategies
|
||||
7. Add protection against frontrunning
|
||||
8. Implement risk management functions
|
||||
|
||||
## Pricing and Profitability
|
||||
|
||||
### Cross-Exchange Price Comparison
|
||||
- Real-time price feeds from all supported exchanges
|
||||
- Price normalization across different exchange types
|
||||
- Time-adjusted pricing for fast-moving markets
|
||||
- Slippage estimation for trade execution
|
||||
|
||||
### Profit Calculation
|
||||
- Calculate potential profit before gas costs
|
||||
- Factor in gas costs for the arbitrage transaction
|
||||
- Account for execution uncertainty
|
||||
- Consider minimum profitability thresholds
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Management
|
||||
- Slippage protection for large trades
|
||||
- Volume consideration based on pool liquidity
|
||||
- Market volatility adjustment
|
||||
- Maximum trade size limits
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Plan
|
||||
|
||||
1. Historical backtesting of arbitrage opportunities
|
||||
2. Simulation of arbitrage execution
|
||||
3. Gas cost estimation accuracy testing
|
||||
4. Front-running resistance testing
|
||||
5. Risk management function verification
|
||||
6. Edge case testing (volatile markets, low liquidity)
|
||||
7. Performance testing under high-frequency conditions
|
||||
8. Accuracy of profit calculation
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- Extremely low-latency price monitoring
|
||||
- Optimized comparison algorithms
|
||||
- Efficient gas estimation
|
||||
- Fast transaction construction
|
||||
- Minimal external calls during opportunity evaluation
|
||||
- Caching of exchange state where possible
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- Proper validation of opportunity parameters
|
||||
- Slippage protection implementation
|
||||
- Gas price monitoring and adjustment
|
||||
- Protection against invalid opportunity signals
|
||||
- Validation of exchange state before execution
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with MEV Bot
|
||||
|
||||
- Coordinate with individual exchange modules
|
||||
- Integrate with transaction submission system
|
||||
- Include in overall profitability evaluation
|
||||
- Consider network congestion in execution timing
|
||||
- Track performance and frequency of successful arbitrages
|
||||
- Optimize for different market conditions
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user