copper-tone-tech/mev-beta
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 7 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(prod): complete production deployment with Podman containerization

Browse Source 
- Migrate from Docker to Podman for enhanced security (rootless containers)
- Add production-ready Dockerfile with multi-stage builds
- Configure production environment with Arbitrum mainnet RPC endpoints
- Add comprehensive test coverage for core modules (exchanges, execution, profitability)
- Implement production audit and deployment documentation
- Update deployment scripts for production environment
- Add container runtime and health monitoring scripts
- Document RPC limitations and remediation strategies
- Implement token metadata caching and pool validation

This commit prepares the MEV bot for production deployment on Arbitrum
with full containerization, security hardening, and operational tooling.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Krypto Kajun
2025-11-08 10:15:22 -06:00
parent 52d555ccdf
commit 8cba462024
55 changed files with 15523 additions and 4908 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

426
docs/CODE_AUDIT_FINDINGS_20251106.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,426 @@
# Code Audit Findings & Production Readiness Analysis
**Date:** November 6, 2025
**Status:** IN PROGRESS - Preliminary Analysis
**Confidence:** High (based on static analysis)
---
## Executive Summary
### Current Status: 🟡 PARTIALLY READY
The codebase has solid foundations but requires validation and corrections before production deployment.
### Key Findings
- ✅ Architecture is sound with proper separation of concerns
- ✅ Gas calculation logic implemented
- ✅ Slippage protection mechanisms in place
- ⚠️ Test coverage unknown (tests running)
- ⚠️ Error handling needs verification
- ⚠️ Configuration validation required
- ❌ Profitability thresholds may need adjustment
---
## 1. Profit Calculation Analysis
**File:** `pkg/profitcalc/profit_calc.go` (502 lines)
### Strengths ✅
- Multi-DEX price feed integration
- Slippage protection implemented (`SlippageProtector`)
- Gas price updating (30-second interval)
- Min profit threshold configurable
- Confidence scoring system
### Configured Values (CRITICAL)
```
minProfitThreshold: 0.001 ETH
maxSlippage: 3% (0.03)
gasPrice: 0.1 gwei (default)
gasLimit: 100,000 (reduced from 300k for Arbitrum L2)
gasPriceUpdateInterval: 30 seconds
```
### Issues to Verify ⚠️
1. **Min Profit Threshold**: 0.001 ETH may be too high
- Arbitrum transaction costs typically 0.0001-0.0005 ETH
- Current threshold only allows ~2-10x profitable trades
- **RECOMMENDATION**: Lower to 0.0001 ETH for realistic opportunities
2. **Gas Estimation**: Using hardcoded 100k gas limit
- May underestimate for complex multi-hop trades
- Should be dynamic based on path complexity
- **RECOMMENDATION**: Implement adaptive gas estimation
3. **Price Feed**: Multi-DEX price feed not fully visible
- Need to verify all major DEX sources included
- Should handle stale price data
- **RECOMMENDATION**: Audit price feed completeness
---
## 2. Arbitrage Detection Engine Analysis
**File:** `pkg/arbitrage/detection_engine.go` (975 lines)
### Architecture Strengths ✅
- Worker pool pattern for concurrent scanning
- Backpressure handling with semaphore
- Proper mutex protection for shared state
- Structured logging
- Opportunity channel for async handling
### Key Features ✅
- Configurable scanning interval
- Multiple worker pools (scanning + path analysis)
- Opportunity filtering/ranking
- Real-time opportunity distribution
- Rate limiting
### Configuration Parameters
```
ScanInterval: Unknown (need to check)
MaxConcurrentScans: Unknown
MinProfitThreshold: Configurable
MaxProfitThreshold: Configurable
ConfidenceThreshold: Configurable
```
### Areas Requiring Verification ⚠️
1. **Opportunity Filtering**
- How many opportunities are filtered out?
- Are filtering criteria too strict?
- Need baseline metrics
2. **Concurrent Processing**
- How many workers are configured?
- What's the opportunity throughput?
- Are all worker pools properly sized?
3. **Path Analysis**
- How deep are path searches (multi-hop)?
- What's the maximum path length considered?
- Are all possible paths being explored?
---
## 3. Token & Metadata Handling
**File:** `pkg/tokens/metadata_cache.go` (498 lines)
### Current Implementation ✅
- Token metadata caching
- Decimal handling
- Price tracking
### Potential Issues ⚠️
1. **Stale Data**: How often is cache refreshed?
2. **Missing Tokens**: What happens for unlisted tokens?
3. **Decimals**: Are all token decimals correctly handled?
---
## 4. Swap Analysis
**File:** `pkg/scanner/swap/analyzer.go` (1053 lines)
### What We Know ✅
- Analyzes swaps for opportunities
- Price impact calculations
- Complex multi-hop analysis
### Key Questions ⚠️
1. Is it correctly identifying all swap opportunities?
2. Are slippage calculations accurate?
3. Is gas estimation comprehensive?
---
## 5. Main Bot Entry Point
**File:** `cmd/mev-bot/main.go` (799 lines)
### Needs Verification
- Error handling during startup
- Graceful shutdown
- Configuration loading
- RPC connection management
- Health checks
- Logging setup
---
## Critical Configuration Issues
### 1. RPC Endpoint Configuration
**Concern:** RPC rate limiting and failover
- How many RPC endpoints configured?
- What's the rate limit per endpoint?
- Are there fallback endpoints?
- **RECOMMENDATION**: Verify 2+ endpoints with failover
### 2. Minimum Profit Threshold
**Current:** 0.001 ETH
**Analysis:**
```
Arbitrum Gas Costs:
- Simple swap: ~0.00005-0.0001 ETH
- Multi-hop: ~0.0002-0.0005 ETH
- Flash loan: ~0.00001 ETH (Balancer, 0% fee)
Minimum Viable Profit at 0.001 ETH threshold:
- At $2000/ETH = $2 minimum trade
- At 0.1% spread = $2000 pool liquidity needed
- Very conservative
```
**RECOMMENDATION:** Lower threshold to 0.0001 ETH
### 3. Gas Price Settings
**Current:** Hardcoded 0.1 gwei + dynamic updates
**Issue:** Arbitrum L2 pricing model different from L1
- Should use current gas price from RPC
- 30-second updates might be too frequent
- **RECOMMENDATION**: Verify gas price source
---
## Test Coverage Gaps (PREDICTED)
Based on code analysis, likely gaps:
### 1. Edge Cases Not Covered
- Zero amount handling
- Extreme price discrepancies
- Network errors during calculation
- Stale price data handling
### 2. Multi-Hop Paths
- 3-hop arbitrage paths
- Complex routing scenarios
- Circular opportunities
### 3. Error Scenarios
- RPC connection failures
- Rate limit handling
- Timeout scenarios
- Corrupted data handling
### 4. Concurrent Operations
- Race conditions in opportunity detection
- Worker pool saturation
- Memory leaks in long-running processes
---
## Production Readiness Checklist
### Configuration ⚠️
- [ ] RPC endpoints configured with failover
- [ ] Min profit threshold validated against market data
- [ ] Gas estimation verified for all transaction types
- [ ] Rate limiting properly configured
- [ ] Error recovery mechanisms active
### Functionality ✅ (Needs Testing)
- [ ] Opportunity detection working end-to-end
- [ ] Profit calculation accurate
- [ ] Slippage protection active
- [ ] Gas costs properly estimated
- [ ] Transaction building correct
### Reliability ⚠️
- [ ] Health checks operational
- [ ] Logging complete
- [ ] Error handling comprehensive
- [ ] Graceful shutdown implemented
- [ ] Recovery from failures
### Performance ⚠️
- [ ] Opportunity detection < 1 second
- [ ] Transaction building < 1 second
- [ ] Memory usage stable
- [ ] CPU usage reasonable
- [ ] No goroutine leaks
### Security ✅
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets
- [ ] Input validation comprehensive
- [ ] Error messages don't leak sensitive data
- [ ] Rate limiting enforced
- [ ] Access control proper
---
## Recommended Improvements
### IMMEDIATE (Before Production)
1. **Lower Min Profit Threshold**
- Change from 0.001 ETH to 0.0001 ETH
- File: `pkg/profitcalc/profit_calc.go:61`
- Reason: Current threshold too high for realistic opportunities
2. **Verify RPC Configuration**
- Ensure failover endpoints configured
- Verify rate limiting settings
- Test connection resilience
3. **Run Full Test Suite**
- Fix any failing tests
- Ensure 100% coverage
- Add missing test cases
### SHORT TERM (First Week)
1. **Implement Adaptive Gas Estimation**
- Current: hardcoded 100k gas
- Target: dynamic based on path complexity
- Impact: More accurate profitability
2. **Add More Logging**
- Log all opportunity detections
- Log profit calculations with details
- Log transaction attempts and results
3. **Implement Health Checks**
- RPC endpoint health
- Market data freshness
- System resource monitoring
### MEDIUM TERM (Ongoing)
1. **Performance Optimization**
- Benchmark opportunity detection
- Optimize database queries
- Reduce latency to execution
2. **Advanced Features**
- Cross-chain opportunities
- More DEX integrations
- Advanced risk management
---
## Metrics to Monitor
Once in production, track these metrics:
### Detection Metrics
```
Opportunities detected per minute
Average detection latency (ms)
Distribution by profit range
Distribution by path length
Filter-out rate (how many filtered vs executed)
```
### Execution Metrics
```
Execution success rate (%)
Average profit per trade (ETH/USD)
Total profit per day/week/month
Average gas cost (ETH/USD)
Net profit after gas costs
```
### System Metrics
```
Memory usage (MB)
CPU usage (%)
Goroutine count
RPC request rate
Error rate (%)
```
---
## Risk Assessment
### HIGH RISK 🔴
1. **Unknown test coverage**
- Tests currently running
- Coverage percentage unknown
- May have critical gaps
2. **Configuration not validated**
- Min profit threshold unverified
- RPC endpoints unknown
- Gas settings not confirmed
3. **Error handling untested**
- Network failure scenarios
- Configuration errors
- Edge cases
### MEDIUM RISK 🟡
1. **Performance unknown**
- Opportunity detection speed
- Memory usage under load
- Concurrent operation limits
2. **Market data freshness**
- Price feed update frequency
- How stale prices are handled
- Multi-DEX price reconciliation
### LOW RISK 🟢
1. **Core architecture**
- Design is sound
- Proper separation of concerns
- Good use of Go patterns
2. **Security basics**
- No obvious hardcoded secrets (visible)
- Input validation present
- Proper logging without leakage
---
## Next Steps
### Immediate (Current)
1. Wait for test results
2. Analyze any test failures
3. Fix identified issues
4. Run coverage analysis
### Short Term (Today)
1. Review and adjust configuration
2. Lower min profit threshold
3. Verify RPC setup
4. Run integration tests
### Medium Term (This Week)
1. Deploy to testnet
2. Monitor for 24+ hours
3. Collect metrics
4. Optimize based on data
### Production Deployment
1. Only after all above complete
2. With continuous monitoring
3. With automated alerts
4. With kill switches ready
---
## Conclusion
**Current Assessment:** Codebase is structurally sound but requires testing, configuration validation, and threshold adjustments before production use.
**Estimated Time to Production Ready:**
- With successful tests: 2-3 hours
- With test failures: 4-8 hours
- With major issues: 1-2 days
**Confidence in Profitability:** Medium
- Architecture supports finding opportunities
- Configuration may need adjustment
- Real-world testing needed
**Recommendation:** Proceed with testing and fixes as outlined.
---
Generated: 2025-11-06
Status: PRELIMINARY (Based on static analysis)
Next: Update based on actual test results