# Code Audit Findings & Production Readiness Analysis **Date:** November 6, 2025 **Status:** IN PROGRESS - Preliminary Analysis **Confidence:** High (based on static analysis) --- ## Executive Summary ### Current Status: 🟡 PARTIALLY READY The codebase has solid foundations but requires validation and corrections before production deployment. ### Key Findings - ✅ Architecture is sound with proper separation of concerns - ✅ Gas calculation logic implemented - ✅ Slippage protection mechanisms in place - ⚠️ Test coverage unknown (tests running) - ⚠️ Error handling needs verification - ⚠️ Configuration validation required - ❌ Profitability thresholds may need adjustment --- ## 1. Profit Calculation Analysis **File:** `pkg/profitcalc/profit_calc.go` (502 lines) ### Strengths ✅ - Multi-DEX price feed integration - Slippage protection implemented (`SlippageProtector`) - Gas price updating (30-second interval) - Min profit threshold configurable - Confidence scoring system ### Configured Values (CRITICAL) ``` minProfitThreshold: 0.001 ETH maxSlippage: 3% (0.03) gasPrice: 0.1 gwei (default) gasLimit: 100,000 (reduced from 300k for Arbitrum L2) gasPriceUpdateInterval: 30 seconds ``` ### Issues to Verify ⚠️ 1. **Min Profit Threshold**: 0.001 ETH may be too high - Arbitrum transaction costs typically 0.0001-0.0005 ETH - Current threshold only allows ~2-10x profitable trades - **RECOMMENDATION**: Lower to 0.0001 ETH for realistic opportunities 2. **Gas Estimation**: Using hardcoded 100k gas limit - May underestimate for complex multi-hop trades - Should be dynamic based on path complexity - **RECOMMENDATION**: Implement adaptive gas estimation 3. **Price Feed**: Multi-DEX price feed not fully visible - Need to verify all major DEX sources included - Should handle stale price data - **RECOMMENDATION**: Audit price feed completeness --- ## 2. Arbitrage Detection Engine Analysis **File:** `pkg/arbitrage/detection_engine.go` (975 lines) ### Architecture Strengths ✅ - Worker pool pattern for concurrent scanning - Backpressure handling with semaphore - Proper mutex protection for shared state - Structured logging - Opportunity channel for async handling ### Key Features ✅ - Configurable scanning interval - Multiple worker pools (scanning + path analysis) - Opportunity filtering/ranking - Real-time opportunity distribution - Rate limiting ### Configuration Parameters ``` ScanInterval: Unknown (need to check) MaxConcurrentScans: Unknown MinProfitThreshold: Configurable MaxProfitThreshold: Configurable ConfidenceThreshold: Configurable ``` ### Areas Requiring Verification ⚠️ 1. **Opportunity Filtering** - How many opportunities are filtered out? - Are filtering criteria too strict? - Need baseline metrics 2. **Concurrent Processing** - How many workers are configured? - What's the opportunity throughput? - Are all worker pools properly sized? 3. **Path Analysis** - How deep are path searches (multi-hop)? - What's the maximum path length considered? - Are all possible paths being explored? --- ## 3. Token & Metadata Handling **File:** `pkg/tokens/metadata_cache.go` (498 lines) ### Current Implementation ✅ - Token metadata caching - Decimal handling - Price tracking ### Potential Issues ⚠️ 1. **Stale Data**: How often is cache refreshed? 2. **Missing Tokens**: What happens for unlisted tokens? 3. **Decimals**: Are all token decimals correctly handled? --- ## 4. Swap Analysis **File:** `pkg/scanner/swap/analyzer.go` (1053 lines) ### What We Know ✅ - Analyzes swaps for opportunities - Price impact calculations - Complex multi-hop analysis ### Key Questions ⚠️ 1. Is it correctly identifying all swap opportunities? 2. Are slippage calculations accurate? 3. Is gas estimation comprehensive? --- ## 5. Main Bot Entry Point **File:** `cmd/mev-bot/main.go` (799 lines) ### Needs Verification - Error handling during startup - Graceful shutdown - Configuration loading - RPC connection management - Health checks - Logging setup --- ## Critical Configuration Issues ### 1. RPC Endpoint Configuration **Concern:** RPC rate limiting and failover - How many RPC endpoints configured? - What's the rate limit per endpoint? - Are there fallback endpoints? - **RECOMMENDATION**: Verify 2+ endpoints with failover ### 2. Minimum Profit Threshold **Current:** 0.001 ETH **Analysis:** ``` Arbitrum Gas Costs: - Simple swap: ~0.00005-0.0001 ETH - Multi-hop: ~0.0002-0.0005 ETH - Flash loan: ~0.00001 ETH (Balancer, 0% fee) Minimum Viable Profit at 0.001 ETH threshold: - At $2000/ETH = $2 minimum trade - At 0.1% spread = $2000 pool liquidity needed - Very conservative ``` **RECOMMENDATION:** Lower threshold to 0.0001 ETH ### 3. Gas Price Settings **Current:** Hardcoded 0.1 gwei + dynamic updates **Issue:** Arbitrum L2 pricing model different from L1 - Should use current gas price from RPC - 30-second updates might be too frequent - **RECOMMENDATION**: Verify gas price source --- ## Test Coverage Gaps (PREDICTED) Based on code analysis, likely gaps: ### 1. Edge Cases Not Covered - Zero amount handling - Extreme price discrepancies - Network errors during calculation - Stale price data handling ### 2. Multi-Hop Paths - 3-hop arbitrage paths - Complex routing scenarios - Circular opportunities ### 3. Error Scenarios - RPC connection failures - Rate limit handling - Timeout scenarios - Corrupted data handling ### 4. Concurrent Operations - Race conditions in opportunity detection - Worker pool saturation - Memory leaks in long-running processes --- ## Production Readiness Checklist ### Configuration ⚠️ - [ ] RPC endpoints configured with failover - [ ] Min profit threshold validated against market data - [ ] Gas estimation verified for all transaction types - [ ] Rate limiting properly configured - [ ] Error recovery mechanisms active ### Functionality ✅ (Needs Testing) - [ ] Opportunity detection working end-to-end - [ ] Profit calculation accurate - [ ] Slippage protection active - [ ] Gas costs properly estimated - [ ] Transaction building correct ### Reliability ⚠️ - [ ] Health checks operational - [ ] Logging complete - [ ] Error handling comprehensive - [ ] Graceful shutdown implemented - [ ] Recovery from failures ### Performance ⚠️ - [ ] Opportunity detection < 1 second - [ ] Transaction building < 1 second - [ ] Memory usage stable - [ ] CPU usage reasonable - [ ] No goroutine leaks ### Security ✅ - [ ] No hardcoded secrets - [ ] Input validation comprehensive - [ ] Error messages don't leak sensitive data - [ ] Rate limiting enforced - [ ] Access control proper --- ## Recommended Improvements ### IMMEDIATE (Before Production) 1. **Lower Min Profit Threshold** - Change from 0.001 ETH to 0.0001 ETH - File: `pkg/profitcalc/profit_calc.go:61` - Reason: Current threshold too high for realistic opportunities 2. **Verify RPC Configuration** - Ensure failover endpoints configured - Verify rate limiting settings - Test connection resilience 3. **Run Full Test Suite** - Fix any failing tests - Ensure 100% coverage - Add missing test cases ### SHORT TERM (First Week) 1. **Implement Adaptive Gas Estimation** - Current: hardcoded 100k gas - Target: dynamic based on path complexity - Impact: More accurate profitability 2. **Add More Logging** - Log all opportunity detections - Log profit calculations with details - Log transaction attempts and results 3. **Implement Health Checks** - RPC endpoint health - Market data freshness - System resource monitoring ### MEDIUM TERM (Ongoing) 1. **Performance Optimization** - Benchmark opportunity detection - Optimize database queries - Reduce latency to execution 2. **Advanced Features** - Cross-chain opportunities - More DEX integrations - Advanced risk management --- ## Metrics to Monitor Once in production, track these metrics: ### Detection Metrics ``` Opportunities detected per minute Average detection latency (ms) Distribution by profit range Distribution by path length Filter-out rate (how many filtered vs executed) ``` ### Execution Metrics ``` Execution success rate (%) Average profit per trade (ETH/USD) Total profit per day/week/month Average gas cost (ETH/USD) Net profit after gas costs ``` ### System Metrics ``` Memory usage (MB) CPU usage (%) Goroutine count RPC request rate Error rate (%) ``` --- ## Risk Assessment ### HIGH RISK 🔴 1. **Unknown test coverage** - Tests currently running - Coverage percentage unknown - May have critical gaps 2. **Configuration not validated** - Min profit threshold unverified - RPC endpoints unknown - Gas settings not confirmed 3. **Error handling untested** - Network failure scenarios - Configuration errors - Edge cases ### MEDIUM RISK 🟡 1. **Performance unknown** - Opportunity detection speed - Memory usage under load - Concurrent operation limits 2. **Market data freshness** - Price feed update frequency - How stale prices are handled - Multi-DEX price reconciliation ### LOW RISK 🟢 1. **Core architecture** - Design is sound - Proper separation of concerns - Good use of Go patterns 2. **Security basics** - No obvious hardcoded secrets (visible) - Input validation present - Proper logging without leakage --- ## Next Steps ### Immediate (Current) 1. Wait for test results 2. Analyze any test failures 3. Fix identified issues 4. Run coverage analysis ### Short Term (Today) 1. Review and adjust configuration 2. Lower min profit threshold 3. Verify RPC setup 4. Run integration tests ### Medium Term (This Week) 1. Deploy to testnet 2. Monitor for 24+ hours 3. Collect metrics 4. Optimize based on data ### Production Deployment 1. Only after all above complete 2. With continuous monitoring 3. With automated alerts 4. With kill switches ready --- ## Conclusion **Current Assessment:** Codebase is structurally sound but requires testing, configuration validation, and threshold adjustments before production use. **Estimated Time to Production Ready:** - With successful tests: 2-3 hours - With test failures: 4-8 hours - With major issues: 1-2 days **Confidence in Profitability:** Medium - Architecture supports finding opportunities - Configuration may need adjustment - Real-world testing needed **Recommendation:** Proceed with testing and fixes as outlined. --- Generated: 2025-11-06 Status: PRELIMINARY (Based on static analysis) Next: Update based on actual test results