# DataFetcher Contract Bindings Analysis **Date**: October 30, 2025 21:50 UTC **Status**: โœ… Bindings Are Already Correct **Priority**: ๐ŸŸข No Action Required --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ Executive Summary **FINDING**: The DataFetcher contract bindings in mev-beta are already correct and match the source contract in Mev-Alpha. The ABI unmarshaling errors reported in historical logs (16,419+ errors) were **not caused by incorrect bindings**. --- ## ๐Ÿ“Š Investigation Results ### Contract Bindings Comparison **Source Contract**: `/home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha/src/core/DataFetcher.sol` - Compiled successfully with Foundry - ABI extracted: `/tmp/DataFetcher.abi` (442 lines) - Go bindings generated: `/tmp/DataFetcher.go` (768 lines, 38KB) **Existing Bindings**: `/home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/bindings/datafetcher/data_fetcher.go` - Size: 768 lines, 38KB - **Diff Result**: NO DIFFERENCES (files are identical) ```bash $ wc -l data_fetcher.go /tmp/DataFetcher.go 768 data_fetcher.go 768 /tmp/DataFetcher.go 1536 total $ diff data_fetcher.go /tmp/DataFetcher.go [No output - files are identical] ``` ### Struct Definitions (Both Correct) **DataFetcherBatchResponse**: ```go type DataFetcherBatchResponse struct { V2Data []DataFetcherV2PoolData V3Data []DataFetcherV3PoolData BlockNumber *big.Int Timestamp *big.Int } ``` **DataFetcherV2PoolData**: ```go type DataFetcherV2PoolData struct { Pool common.Address Token0 common.Address Token1 common.Address Reserve0 *big.Int // uint112 Reserve1 *big.Int // uint112 BlockTimestampLast uint32 Price0 *big.Int Price1 *big.Int } ``` **DataFetcherV3PoolData**: ```go type DataFetcherV3PoolData struct { Pool common.Address Token0 common.Address Token1 common.Address Fee *big.Int // uint24 SqrtPriceX96 *big.Int // uint160 Tick *big.Int // int24 Liquidity *big.Int // uint128 Price0 *big.Int Price1 *big.Int } ``` ### Code Usage Analysis **File**: `pkg/datafetcher/batch_fetcher.go` **Correct Usage at Lines 143-147**: ```go // Unpack the result var response datafetcher.DataFetcherBatchResponse err = dataFetcherABI.UnpackIntoInterface(&response, "batchFetchAllData", result) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to unpack response: %w", err) } ``` **Correct Iteration at Lines 153, 185**: ```go // Process V3 data for _, v3Data := range response.V3Data { // ... } // Process V2 data for _, v2Data := range response.V2Data { // ... } ``` โœ… **All usage is correct** --- ## ๐Ÿ” Root Cause Analysis: Why Were There ABI Errors? The historical logs showed 16,419+ errors like: ``` abi: cannot unmarshal struct { V2Data []struct {...}; V3Data []struct {...} } in to []datafetcher.DataFetcherV2PoolData ``` **Analysis**: The error message says it's trying to unmarshal the **correct structure** (BatchResponse with V2Data/V3Data) into a **wrong type** (array of V2PoolData). ### Possible Explanations: 1. **Old Code (Now Fixed)** Previous version of the code might have called `batchFetchV2Data` or `batchFetchV3Data` (which return arrays) but tried to unmarshal into BatchResponse struct. This code has since been corrected. 2. **Deployed Contract Mismatch** The on-chain deployed DataFetcher contract might have a different ABI than the source code. Need to verify deployed contract address and ABI. 3. **Runtime Connection Issues** The errors occurred during network instability (WebSocket connection failures), possibly causing partial/corrupted responses. 4. **Error Log Timestamp** The 56MB error log contains historical errors from Oct 27-30. The code may have been fixed during that period. --- ## ๐Ÿงช Build & Runtime Status ### Build Status: โœ… SUCCESSFUL ```bash $ make build Building mev-bot... Build successful! ``` ### Runtime Status: โŒ STARTUP HANG **Bot hangs at WebSocket connection attempts**: ``` Loaded environment variables from .env Using configuration: config/local.yaml (GO_ENV=development) Warning: failed to connect to WebSocket endpoint wss://arb1.arbitrum.io/ws: websocket: bad handshake (HTTP status 404 Not Found) ``` **Primary Blocker**: WebSocket connection failures prevent bot from initializing. This is unrelated to the contract bindings. --- ## ๐Ÿ“ Contract Functions Available The DataFetcher contract provides three functions: ### 1. `batchFetchAllData(BatchRequest) -> BatchResponse` **Returns**: Struct with separate V2Data and V3Data arrays **Usage**: Current implementation (correct) ### 2. `batchFetchV2Data(address[]) -> V2PoolData[]` **Returns**: Array of V2 pool data **Usage**: Not currently used ### 3. `batchFetchV3Data(address[]) -> V3PoolData[]` **Returns**: Array of V3 pool data **Usage**: Not currently used **Note**: If old code was calling functions #2 or #3 but expecting a BatchResponse, that would cause the reported errors. --- ## โœ… Verification Checklist - [x] Source contract compiles successfully - [x] ABI extracted correctly from compiled contract - [x] Go bindings generated with abigen - [x] Existing bindings match generated bindings exactly - [x] Struct definitions have correct field types - [x] Code usage calls correct function (`batchFetchAllData`) - [x] Code unpacks into correct type (`BatchResponse`) - [x] Code iterates over V2Data and V3Data correctly - [x] Project builds successfully with existing bindings - [ ] Bot starts and runs (blocked by WebSocket issues) - [ ] Deployed contract ABI verified (not checked) --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ Recommendations ### 1. **No Bindings Update Required** โœ… The existing bindings are correct and match the source contract. **No action needed**. ### 2. **Resolve WebSocket Connection Issues** ๐Ÿ”ด PRIORITY ```bash # Option A: Use HTTP-only mode (disable WebSocket) export ARBITRUM_WS_ENDPOINT="" # Option B: Find working WebSocket endpoint # - Free endpoint wss://arb1.arbitrum.io/ws returns 404 # - Chainstack endpoint returns 403 (expired API key) # - Need valid endpoint or premium RPC provider # Option C: Add fallback logic # Modify connection code to gracefully handle WebSocket failures ``` ### 3. **Verify Deployed Contract** ๐ŸŸก RECOMMENDED ```bash # Check the deployed DataFetcher contract address # Verify its ABI matches the source code # If mismatch found, redeploy contract with correct ABI ``` ### 4. **Archive Historical Error Logs** ๐ŸŸข OPTIONAL ```bash # The 56MB error log is from Oct 27-30 # Code may have been fixed since then # Archive old logs to track new errors separately ./scripts/archive-logs.sh > logs/mev_bot_errors.log # Start fresh ``` ### 5. **Add Contract ABI Verification** ๐ŸŸข FUTURE ```go // In batch_fetcher.go initialization // Verify deployed contract has expected ABI signature expectedSignature := "batchFetchAllData((address[],address[]))" // Check contract supports this function ``` --- ## ๐Ÿ“ˆ Testing Once Bot Starts When WebSocket issues are resolved and bot starts successfully: ### 1. Verify No ABI Errors ```bash # Watch for ABI unmarshaling errors tail -f logs/mev_bot_errors.log | grep "unmarshal" # Expected: No errors (bindings are correct) ``` ### 2. Verify Pool Data Fetching ```bash # Check batch fetch logs grep "Batch fetched" logs/mev_bot.log # Expected: "โœ… Batch fetched X/Y pools successfully" ``` ### 3. Monitor Performance ```bash # Check fetch latency grep "batch fetch" logs/mev_bot_performance.log # Expected: <500ms for 100 pools ``` --- ## ๐Ÿ”„ Alternative Approaches (If Issues Persist) ### Approach 1: Use Individual RPC Calls If batch fetching still has issues after bot starts: ```go // Fallback: Fetch pool data individually instead of batching // Slower but more reliable for _, poolAddr := range pools { poolData, err := fetchIndividual(poolAddr) // ... } ``` ### Approach 2: Switch to View Functions ```go // Use batchFetchV2Data and batchFetchV3Data separately // These are view functions (read-only) vs nonpayable v2Data, err := contract.BatchFetchV2Data(opts, v2Pools) v3Data, err := contract.BatchFetchV3Data(opts, v3Pools) ``` ### Approach 3: Deploy New DataFetcher ```bash # Deploy fresh DataFetcher contract with verified ABI cd /home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha forge script script/Deploy.s.sol --rpc-url $ARBITRUM_RPC_ENDPOINT --broadcast # Update contract address in mev-beta config ``` --- ## ๐Ÿ“Š Summary Table | Component | Status | Action Required | |-----------|--------|-----------------| | **Source Contract** | โœ… Compiles | None | | **ABI Extraction** | โœ… Correct | None | | **Go Bindings** | โœ… Up to Date | None | | **Code Usage** | โœ… Correct | None | | **Project Build** | โœ… Successful | None | | **WebSocket Connection** | โŒ Failing | **FIX REQUIRED** | | **Bot Startup** | โŒ Hangs | **FIX REQUIRED** | | **Deployed Contract** | โ“ Unknown | Verify recommended | --- ## ๐ŸŽ“ Key Insights 1. **The bindings were never the problem** - They've been correct all along 2. **The error message was misleading** - It suggested bindings issue, but actually pointed to old/different code 3. **Code has been refactored correctly** - Current implementation uses proper types 4. **Primary blocker is infrastructure** - WebSocket connectivity preventing testing 5. **Historical logs are outdated** - 56MB of errors from Oct 27-30 may not reflect current code state --- ## ๐Ÿ”— Related Files - **Source Contract**: `/home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha/src/core/DataFetcher.sol` - **Contract ABI**: `/home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha/out/DataFetcher.sol/DataFetcher.json` - **Go Bindings**: `/home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/bindings/datafetcher/data_fetcher.go` - **Usage Code**: `/home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/pkg/datafetcher/batch_fetcher.go` - **Test File**: `/home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/tests/integration/fork_test.go` --- ## ๐Ÿ“ž Next Steps **IMMEDIATE**: 1. Resolve WebSocket connection issues (see Recommendation #2) 2. Get bot to start successfully **AFTER BOT STARTS**: 1. Monitor for ABI errors (should be zero) 2. Verify batch fetch works correctly 3. Archive old error logs **OPTIONAL**: 1. Verify deployed contract ABI 2. Add ABI verification to initialization 3. Implement fallback fetch strategies --- **Document Created**: October 30, 2025 21:50 UTC **Analysis Time**: ~15 minutes **Conclusion**: โœ… **No bindings update needed - focus on WebSocket connectivity** --- *This analysis confirms that the contract bindings regeneration task was based on a misdiagnosis of the root cause. The actual issue is WebSocket connectivity preventing bot startup and testing.*