# MEV Bot - Comprehensive 100-Point Security & Production Audit

**Date**: 2025-10-26
**Version**: 1.0
**Auditor**: Claude Code
**Project**: MEV Beta (mev-beta + Mev-Alpha)
**Status**: In Progress

---

## Audit Scoring System

- ✅ **PASS**: Meets requirement fully
- ⚠️ **WARN**: Partial compliance, needs attention
- ❌ **FAIL**: Does not meet requirement, critical issue
- 🔄 **IN PROGRESS**: Currently being addressed
- ⏸️ **NOT APPLICABLE**: Not relevant to current deployment

**Target Score**: 90/100 (90% for production readiness)

---

## Section 1: Smart Contract Security (Solidity) - 25 Points

### 1.1 Access Control (5 points)

- [ ] **1.1.1** All sensitive functions have appropriate access modifiers (onlyOwner, onlyAuthorized)
  - Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:25-28`, `src/core/BaseFlashSwapper.sol:51-54`
  - Status: ⏸️ Requires manual verification
  - Action: Review all external/public functions

- [ ] **1.1.2** Owner privileges can be transferred securely (2-step ownership transfer)
  - Location: Uses OpenZeppelin Ownable2Step pattern
  - Status: ⏸️ Check if Ownable2Step is used
  - Action: Verify inheritance chain

- [ ] **1.1.3** Critical operations have multi-signature requirements or timelocks
  - Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:288` (EMERGENCY_TIMELOCK = 48 hours)
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify timelock implementation
  - Action: Test emergency withdrawal timelock

- [ ] **1.1.4** No functions allow arbitrary external calls without validation
  - Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:193-223` (swap execution with selector validation)
  - Status: ⏸️ Requires code review
  - Action: Audit all `.call()` usage

- [ ] **1.1.5** Role-based access control properly implemented for multi-user scenarios
  - Location: `authorizedCallers`, `authorizedDEXes` mappings
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify authorization checks
  - Action: Test unauthorized access attempts

### 1.2 Reentrancy Protection (5 points)

- [ ] **1.2.1** All state-changing external functions use ReentrancyGuard
  - Location: `ArbitrageExecutor`, `BaseFlashSwapper` inherit `ReentrancyGuard`
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify all external functions
  - Action: Grep for `external.*{` and check modifiers

- [ ] **1.2.2** Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern followed consistently
  - Location: All swap execution functions
  - Status: ⏸️ Manual code review required
  - Action: Review state changes before external calls

- [ ] **1.2.3** No recursive external calls to untrusted contracts
  - Location: DEX interactions
  - Status: ⏸️ Review call flow
  - Action: Map all external call chains

- [ ] **1.2.4** Flash loan callback validation prevents unauthorized callbacks
  - Location: `src/dex/UniswapV3FlashSwapper.sol:87-149` (uniswapV3FlashCallback)
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify pool validation
  - Action: Test with fake pool contracts

- [ ] **1.2.5** Reentrancy protection doesn't have gas inefficiencies
  - Location: OpenZeppelin ReentrancyGuard implementation
  - Status: ⏸️ Gas profiling needed
  - Action: Benchmark with/without guard

### 1.3 Input Validation (5 points)

- [ ] **1.3.1** All array lengths are validated before iteration
  - Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:100-102` (token/pool length checks)
  - Status: ⏸️ Check all array operations
  - Action: Search for `.length` usage

- [ ] **1.3.2** Address parameters validated against zero address
  - Location: Multiple locations (constructor validation)
  - Status: ⏸️ Comprehensive check needed
  - Action: Grep for `address.*{` and verify checks

- [ ] **1.3.3** Numeric parameters have range validation (min/max bounds)
  - Location: `src/dex/UniswapV3FlashSwapper.sol:62` (uint128 max check)
  - Status: ⏸️ Check all numeric inputs
  - Action: Review for overflow/underflow risks

- [ ] **1.3.4** Function selector validation prevents arbitrary function calls
  - Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:42-59` (allowedSwapSelectors)
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify whitelist completeness
  - Action: Test with invalid selectors

- [ ] **1.3.5** Deadline parameters prevent stale transaction execution
  - Location: Multiple functions use `deadline` parameter
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify enforcement
  - Action: Test with expired deadlines

### 1.4 Integer Arithmetic Safety (5 points)

- [ ] **1.4.1** Solidity 0.8.x automatic overflow protection utilized
  - Location: `pragma solidity ^0.8.19`
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - Using 0.8.19
  - Action: None required

- [ ] **1.4.2** Unchecked blocks only used where overflow is impossible
  - Location: Search for `unchecked {` blocks
  - Status: ⏸️ Review each unchecked block
  - Action: Justify each unchecked usage

- [ ] **1.4.3** Division by zero checks in place
  - Location: DEXMath library, price calculations
  - Status: ⏸️ Check all division operations
  - Action: Test with zero denominators

- [ ] **1.4.4** Precision loss in calculations minimized
  - Location: Price calculations, liquidity math
  - Status: ⏸️ Review calculation order
  - Action: Test with extreme values

- [ ] **1.4.5** No unsafe type conversions (e.g., uint256 to uint128)
  - Location: Flash swap amount validations
  - Status: ⏸️ Audit all type casts
  - Action: Search for `uint.*\(.*\)` patterns

### 1.5 External Dependencies (5 points)

- [ ] **1.5.1** OpenZeppelin contracts at latest stable version
  - Location: Check package dependencies
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify versions
  - Action: `forge update` and check versions

- [ ] **1.5.2** Uniswap V2/V3 interfaces match deployed contracts
  - Location: Interface definitions
  - Status: ⏸️ Compare with on-chain ABIs
  - Action: Fetch ABIs from Arbiscan and compare

- [ ] **1.5.3** No outdated or vulnerable dependencies
  - Location: All imports
  - Status: ⏸️ Security scan needed
  - Action: Run `forge audit` / `slither`

- [ ] **1.5.4** Custom interfaces properly implement expected standards
  - Location: IArbitrage, IFlashSwapper
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify ERC165 compliance
  - Action: Test supportsInterface()

- [ ] **1.5.5** DEX protocol assumptions documented and validated
  - Location: README, inline comments
  - Status: ⏸️ Documentation review
  - Action: Document all DEX assumptions

---

## Section 2: Go Code Security & Quality - 20 Points

### 2.1 Input Validation (4 points)

- [ ] **2.1.1** All RPC responses validated before processing
  - Location: `pkg/arbitrum/abi_decoder.go`, `pkg/uniswap/contracts.go`
  - Status: ⏸️ Review validation logic
  - Action: Test with malformed RPC responses

- [ ] **2.1.2** Transaction data validated before signing
  - Location: Transaction building logic
  - Status: ⏸️ Review signing workflow
  - Action: Test with invalid transaction data

- [ ] **2.1.3** Configuration files validated on startup
  - Location: `internal/config`
  - Status: ⏸️ Check config validation
  - Action: Test with invalid config files

- [ ] **2.1.4** Environment variables sanitized and validated
  - Location: Config loading
  - Status: ⏸️ Review env var handling
  - Action: Test with missing/invalid env vars

### 2.2 Error Handling (4 points)

- [ ] **2.2.1** All errors properly wrapped with context
  - Location: Throughout codebase
  - Status: ⏸️ Audit error handling
  - Action: Search for `return err` without wrapping

- [ ] **2.2.2** Panics are recovered and logged appropriately
  - Location: Main goroutines
  - Status: ⏸️ Check panic recovery
  - Action: Search for `defer recover()`

- [ ] **2.2.3** Critical errors trigger alerts/notifications
  - Location: Error handling logic
  - Status: ⏸️ Review alerting system
  - Action: Verify alert configuration

- [ ] **2.2.4** Retry logic with exponential backoff for transient failures
  - Location: RPC client, transaction submission
  - Status: ⏸️ Review retry mechanisms
  - Action: Test with intermittent failures

### 2.3 Concurrency Safety (4 points)

- [ ] **2.3.1** No data races (verified with -race flag)
  - Location: All concurrent code
  - Status: ⏸️ Run race detector
  - Action: `go test -race ./...`

- [ ] **2.3.2** Proper mutex usage for shared state
  - Location: Cache implementations, shared maps
  - Status: ⏸️ Review mutex patterns
  - Action: Audit all `sync.Mutex` usage

- [ ] **2.3.3** Channels used correctly (no deadlocks)
  - Location: Event processing pipelines
  - Status: ⏸️ Test channel operations
  - Action: Stress test with high load

- [ ] **2.3.4** Goroutine leaks prevented (proper cleanup)
  - Location: All goroutine launches
  - Status: ⏸️ Profile goroutines
  - Action: Use pprof to detect leaks

### 2.4 Cryptographic Security (4 points)

- [ ] **2.4.1** Private keys never logged or exposed
  - Location: All logging statements
  - Status: ⏸️ Audit logs
  - Action: Grep logs for sensitive data

- [ ] **2.4.2** Secure key storage (encrypted, not in code)
  - Location: Key management
  - Status: ⏸️ Review key storage
  - Action: Verify encryption at rest

- [ ] **2.4.3** Random number generation uses crypto/rand
  - Location: Nonce generation, if any
  - Status: ⏸️ Check RNG usage
  - Action: Search for `math/rand` usage

- [ ] **2.4.4** Transaction signing uses proper nonce management
  - Location: Transaction builder
  - Status: ⏸️ Review nonce tracking
  - Action: Test concurrent transaction signing

### 2.5 Resource Management (4 points)

- [ ] **2.5.1** Database connections properly pooled and closed
  - Location: Database client initialization
  - Status: ⏸️ Review connection management
  - Action: Check for connection leaks

- [ ] **2.5.2** File descriptors closed after use
  - Location: All file operations
  - Status: ⏸️ Audit file handling
  - Action: Check `defer file.Close()` usage

- [ ] **2.5.3** Memory usage monitored and bounded
  - Location: Large data structures, caches
  - Status: ⏸️ Profile memory usage
  - Action: Run `go tool pprof` heap analysis

- [ ] **2.5.4** Graceful shutdown implemented for all services
  - Location: Main application, signal handling
  - Status: ⏸️ Test shutdown sequence
  - Action: Send SIGTERM and verify cleanup

---

## Section 3: Contract Binding Consistency - 15 Points

### 3.1 Binding Generation (3 points)

- [x] **3.1.1** Bindings generated from latest compiled contracts
  - Location: `bindings/` directory
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - Generated from Mev-Alpha contracts
  - Action: None

- [x] **3.1.2** Binding generation script exists and is automated
  - Location: `scripts/generate-bindings.sh`
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - Script created and tested
  - Action: None

- [ ] **3.1.3** Generated bindings compile without errors
  - Location: `go build ./bindings/...`
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - Verified compilation
  - Action: Add to CI/CD pipeline

### 3.2 Binding Usage (6 points)

- [ ] **3.2.1** All contract calls use generated bindings (not raw ABI)
  - Location: `pkg/uniswap/contracts.go`, others
  - Status: ⚠️ **WARN** - Some files still use manual ABI
  - Action: Refactor 17 files identified in audit

- [ ] **3.2.2** Function signatures match deployed contract ABIs
  - Location: All binding usage
  - Status: ⏸️ Compare with on-chain ABIs
  - Action: Verify against Arbiscan

- [ ] **3.2.3** Event parsing uses binding-generated methods
  - Location: `pkg/events/parser.go`
  - Status: ⚠️ **WARN** - Uses manual event parsing
  - Action: Refactor to use binding events

- [ ] **3.2.4** Type conversions handled correctly (big.Int, addresses)
  - Location: All binding usage
  - Status: ⏸️ Review type handling
  - Action: Test with extreme values

- [ ] **3.2.5** Error handling for contract calls is comprehensive
  - Location: All contract interaction code
  - Status: ⏸️ Audit error handling
  - Action: Test with reverted transactions

- [ ] **3.2.6** Contract addresses centralized and version-tracked
  - Location: `bindings/addresses.go`
  - Status: ⚠️ **WARN** - Addresses set to zero (not deployed)
  - Action: Update after deployment

### 3.3 Binding Testing (3 points)

- [ ] **3.3.1** Integration tests verify binding functionality
  - Location: `tests/integration/fork_test.go`
  - Status: 🔄 **IN PROGRESS** - Tests created, not run
  - Action: Execute fork tests

- [ ] **3.3.2** Binding calls tested against fork environment
  - Location: Integration test suite
  - Status: 🔄 **IN PROGRESS** - Framework ready
  - Action: Run tests

- [ ] **3.3.3** ABI compatibility verified with deployed contracts
  - Location: Test suite
  - Status: ⏸️ Deploy and verify
  - Action: Compare ABIs post-deployment

### 3.4 Documentation (3 points)

- [x] **3.4.1** Binding usage patterns documented
  - Location: `docs/BINDING_CONSISTENCY_GUIDE.md`
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - Comprehensive guide created
  - Action: None

- [x] **3.4.2** Migration guide for manual ABI to bindings exists
  - Location: `TODO_BINDING_MIGRATION.md`
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - Detailed roadmap created
  - Action: Execute migration

- [x] **3.4.3** Contract deployment addresses documented
  - Location: `bindings/addresses.go`, deployment docs
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - Structure in place
  - Action: Update after deployment

---

## Section 4: Testing Coverage - 15 Points

### 4.1 Unit Testing (5 points)

- [ ] **4.1.1** Solidity unit test coverage >80%
  - Location: `test/unit/` directory
  - Status: ⏸️ Measure coverage
  - Action: `forge coverage`

- [ ] **4.1.2** Go unit test coverage >80%
  - Location: `pkg/` test files
  - Status: ⏸️ Measure coverage
  - Action: `go test -cover ./...`

- [ ] **4.1.3** Critical functions have edge case tests
  - Location: Math libraries, ABI decoders
  - Status: ⏸️ Review test cases
  - Action: Add boundary tests

- [ ] **4.1.4** Mock contracts used for isolated testing
  - Location: `test/mocks/`
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify mock completeness
  - Action: Review mock implementations

- [ ] **4.1.5** Test data includes realistic mainnet scenarios
  - Location: Test fixtures
  - Status: ⏸️ Review test data
  - Action: Add real transaction examples

### 4.2 Integration Testing (5 points)

- [ ] **4.2.1** Fork tests validate contract deployments
  - Location: `script/DeployAndTest.s.sol`
  - Status: 🔄 **IN PROGRESS** - Script created
  - Action: Execute on Arbitrum fork

- [ ] **4.2.2** End-to-end arbitrage flow tested
  - Location: `tests/integration/fork_test.go`
  - Status: 🔄 **IN PROGRESS** - Tests written
  - Action: Execute tests

- [ ] **4.2.3** Multi-DEX interactions tested
  - Location: Integration tests
  - Status: ⏸️ Create tests
  - Action: Test Uniswap, Sushiswap, Camelot

- [ ] **4.2.4** Flash loan execution tested end-to-end
  - Location: Flash swap tests
  - Status: ⏸️ Create comprehensive tests
  - Action: Test all flash swap paths

- [ ] **4.2.5** Error conditions tested (reverts, failures)
  - Location: All test suites
  - Status: ⏸️ Add negative tests
  - Action: Test failure scenarios

### 4.3 Performance Testing (3 points)

- [ ] **4.3.1** Gas usage profiled and optimized
  - Location: Solidity contracts
  - Status: ⏸️ Profile gas usage
  - Action: `forge snapshot` and analyze

- [ ] **4.3.2** Transaction throughput benchmarked
  - Location: Go bot processing
  - Status: ⏸️ Benchmark processing speed
  - Action: Measure TPS handling

- [ ] **4.3.3** Memory usage profiled under load
  - Location: Go application
  - Status: ⏸️ Profile memory
  - Action: `go tool pprof` under load

### 4.4 Security Testing (2 points)

- [ ] **4.4.1** Static analysis tools run (Slither, GoSec)
  - Location: CI/CD pipeline
  - Status: ⏸️ Run security scanners
  - Action: `slither .` and `gosec ./...`

- [ ] **4.4.2** Fuzzing tests for critical functions
  - Location: Solidity and Go
  - Status: ⏸️ Implement fuzzing
  - Action: Use Foundry fuzzing and go-fuzz

---

## Section 5: Deployment Readiness - 10 Points

### 5.1 Infrastructure (3 points)

- [ ] **5.1.1** RPC endpoints configured with failover
  - Location: `pkg/arbitrum/connection.go`
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - Multi-endpoint support implemented
  - Action: Test failover mechanism

- [ ] **5.1.2** Rate limiting configured appropriately
  - Location: `internal/ratelimit/`
  - Status: ⏸️ Review rate limits
  - Action: Test against RPC limits

- [ ] **5.1.3** Monitoring and alerting configured
  - Location: Metrics collection
  - Status: ⏸️ Setup monitoring
  - Action: Configure Prometheus/Grafana

### 5.2 Configuration Management (3 points)

- [ ] **5.2.1** Production config separate from dev/test
  - Location: `config/` directory
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify separation
  - Action: Create production configs

- [ ] **5.2.2** Secrets managed securely (not in repo)
  - Location: `.env` files, secret management
  - Status: ⏸️ Audit secret storage
  - Action: Use vault or secret manager

- [ ] **5.2.3** Configuration validation on startup
  - Location: Config loader
  - Status: ⏸️ Test validation
  - Action: Test with invalid configs

### 5.3 Operational Procedures (4 points)

- [ ] **5.3.1** Deployment runbook documented
  - Location: Deployment documentation
  - Status: ⏸️ Create runbook
  - Action: Document step-by-step deployment

- [ ] **5.3.2** Rollback procedure documented and tested
  - Location: Operational docs
  - Status: ⏸️ Create rollback plan
  - Action: Test rollback procedure

- [ ] **5.3.3** Emergency shutdown procedure defined
  - Location: Operational docs
  - Status: ⏸️ Document emergency procedures
  - Action: Create shutdown checklist

- [ ] **5.3.4** On-call rotation and escalation defined
  - Location: Operational docs
  - Status: ⏸️ Define on-call process
  - Action: Create escalation matrix

---

## Section 6: Operational Security - 10 Points

### 6.1 Key Management (3 points)

- [ ] **6.1.1** Private keys encrypted at rest
  - Location: Key storage
  - Status: ⏸️ Verify encryption
  - Action: Test key encryption

- [ ] **6.1.2** Hardware wallet support for production keys
  - Location: Signing logic
  - Status: ⏸️ Implement HSM/hardware wallet
  - Action: Integrate Ledger/Trezor support

- [ ] **6.1.3** Key rotation procedure documented
  - Location: Security docs
  - Status: ⏸️ Create key rotation plan
  - Action: Document rotation steps

### 6.2 Access Control (3 points)

- [ ] **6.2.1** Production server access restricted
  - Location: Infrastructure
  - Status: ⏸️ Configure access controls
  - Action: Setup IAM/SSH restrictions

- [ ] **6.2.2** Audit logging for all privileged operations
  - Location: Logging system
  - Status: ⏸️ Implement audit logs
  - Action: Log all admin operations

- [ ] **6.2.3** Multi-factor authentication required
  - Location: Access systems
  - Status: ⏸️ Enable MFA
  - Action: Enforce MFA for all access

### 6.3 Monitoring (4 points)

- [ ] **6.3.1** Real-time transaction monitoring
  - Location: Monitoring dashboard
  - Status: ⏸️ Setup monitoring
  - Action: Create transaction dashboard

- [ ] **6.3.2** Anomaly detection for unusual activity
  - Location: Alerting system
  - Status: ⏸️ Configure anomaly detection
  - Action: Define normal behavior baselines

- [ ] **6.3.3** Balance monitoring and alerts
  - Location: Wallet monitoring
  - Status: ⏸️ Setup balance alerts
  - Action: Alert on unexpected balance changes

- [ ] **6.3.4** Performance metrics tracked (latency, throughput)
  - Location: Metrics system
  - Status: ⏸️ Collect metrics
  - Action: Setup Prometheus metrics

---

## Section 7: Code Quality - 5 Points

### 7.1 Style & Standards (2 points)

- [ ] **7.1.1** Code follows project style guidelines
  - Location: All code files
  - Status: ⏸️ Run linters
  - Action: `golangci-lint run`, `forge fmt`

- [ ] **7.1.2** No critical linter warnings
  - Location: Lint reports
  - Status: ⏸️ Fix lint issues
  - Action: Address all critical warnings

### 7.2 Documentation (2 points)

- [ ] **7.2.1** All public functions documented
  - Location: All packages
  - Status: ⏸️ Review documentation
  - Action: Add missing docstrings

- [ ] **7.2.2** Complex logic has inline comments
  - Location: Math calculations, algorithms
  - Status: ⏸️ Review comments
  - Action: Add explanatory comments

### 7.3 Maintainability (1 point)

- [ ] **7.3.1** No files >500 lines (modular design)
  - Location: All source files
  - Status: ⏸️ Check file sizes
  - Action: Refactor large files

---

## Section 8: Performance & Scalability - 5 Points

### 8.1 Efficiency (3 points)

- [ ] **8.1.1** Transaction processing <100ms average
  - Location: Processing pipeline
  - Status: ⏸️ Benchmark performance
  - Action: Measure end-to-end latency

- [ ] **8.1.2** Memory footprint <2GB under normal load
  - Location: Application runtime
  - Status: ⏸️ Profile memory
  - Action: Monitor memory usage

- [ ] **8.1.3** No obvious performance bottlenecks
  - Location: All code paths
  - Status: ⏸️ Profile code
  - Action: Use pprof to find bottlenecks

### 8.2 Scalability (2 points)

- [ ] **8.2.1** Can handle 1000+ transactions per second
  - Location: Processing pipeline
  - Status: ⏸️ Load test
  - Action: Stress test with high volume

- [ ] **8.2.2** Horizontally scalable architecture
  - Location: System design
  - Status: ⏸️ Review architecture
  - Action: Document scaling approach

---

## Section 9: Risk Management - 5 Points

### 9.1 Financial Risks (3 points)

- [ ] **9.1.1** Maximum loss per transaction limited
  - Location: Execution logic
  - Status: ⏸️ Implement loss limits
  - Action: Add max loss checks

- [ ] **9.1.2** Daily loss limits enforced
  - Location: Risk management
  - Status: ⏸️ Implement daily limits
  - Action: Track daily P&L

- [ ] **9.1.3** Slippage protection configured
  - Location: Trade execution
  - Status: ✅ **PASS** - MinProfit parameter exists
  - Action: Test slippage scenarios

### 9.2 Operational Risks (2 points)

- [ ] **9.2.1** Circuit breaker for repeated failures
  - Location: Execution logic
  - Status: ⏸️ Implement circuit breaker
  - Action: Add failure threshold checks

- [ ] **9.2.2** Automated trading can be paused/stopped
  - Location: Main control loop
  - Status: ⏸️ Add pause mechanism
  - Action: Implement emergency stop

---

## Audit Execution Commands

### Run Automated Checks

```bash
# Solidity Security
cd /home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha
slither .
forge test --gas-report
forge coverage

# Go Security
cd /home/administrator/projects/mev-beta
gosec ./...
go test -race ./...
go test -cover ./...
golangci-lint run

# Performance
go test -bench=. -benchmem ./...
go tool pprof -http=:8080 cpu.prof

# Integration Tests
forge script script/DeployAndTest.s.sol --fork-url $ARBITRUM_RPC_ENDPOINT -vvvv
go test ./tests/integration -v -timeout 30m
```

### Manual Review Checklist

- [ ] Review all `// TODO` comments
- [ ] Review all `// FIXME` comments
- [ ] Review all `// HACK` comments
- [ ] Check for hardcoded addresses
- [ ] Check for hardcoded private keys
- [ ] Review all `panic()` calls
- [ ] Review all unchecked type conversions
- [ ] Review all external calls

---

## Current Score Estimation

Based on information available:

| Category | Points Possible | Est. Score | % |
|----------|----------------|------------|---|
| 1. Smart Contract Security | 25 | 15 | 60% |
| 2. Go Code Security | 20 | 12 | 60% |
| 3. Contract Bindings | 15 | 12 | 80% |
| 4. Testing Coverage | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 5. Deployment Readiness | 10 | 3 | 30% |
| 6. Operational Security | 10 | 2 | 20% |
| 7. Code Quality | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| 8. Performance | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| 9. Risk Management | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| **TOTAL** | **100** | **57** | **57%** |

**Current Status**: ⚠️ **DEVELOPMENT STAGE** - Not production ready

**Required for Production**: 90/100 (90%)
**Gap**: 33 points

---

## Priority Recommendations

### Critical (Complete Before Production)

1. **Run comprehensive security audit** (Slither, GoSec, manual review)
2. **Execute all integration tests** on Arbitrum fork
3. **Implement operational monitoring** (Prometheus, Grafana)
4. **Setup key management** (hardware wallet integration)
5. **Complete contract deployment** and verify on Arbitrum
6. **Implement circuit breakers** and loss limits
7. **Create operational runbooks** (deployment, rollback, emergency)

### High Priority (Complete Within 1 Week)

8. **Achieve 80%+ test coverage** (Solidity and Go)
9. **Refactor manual ABI usage** to use bindings
10. **Performance profiling** and optimization
11. **Setup monitoring and alerting**
12. **Document all procedures**

### Medium Priority (Complete Within 1 Month)

13. **Implement fuzzing tests**
14. **Setup CI/CD pipeline**
15. **Create disaster recovery plan**
16. **Conduct load testing**

---

## Next Steps

1. **Execute automated audit tools** (see commands above)
2. **Run fork deployment test** (`forge script script/DeployAndTest.s.sol`)
3. **Complete integration test suite**
4. **Address all ❌ FAIL and ⚠️ WARN items**
5. **Re-run audit to achieve 90/100 score**

**Audit Report Generated**: 2025-10-26
**Next Review Date**: After critical items completed