copper-tone-tech/mev-beta
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 7 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
f41adbe575f0482f8b75f0cf89c37068188466e2
mev-beta/docs/BINDINGS_ANALYSIS_20251030.md

10 KiB
Raw Blame History

DataFetcher Contract Bindings Analysis

Date: October 30, 2025 21:50 UTC Status: ✅ Bindings Are Already Correct Priority: 🟢 No Action Required

🎯 Executive Summary

FINDING: The DataFetcher contract bindings in mev-beta are already correct and match the source contract in Mev-Alpha. The ABI unmarshaling errors reported in historical logs (16,419+ errors) were not caused by incorrect bindings.

📊 Investigation Results

Contract Bindings Comparison

Source Contract: /home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha/src/core/DataFetcher.sol

  • Compiled successfully with Foundry
  • ABI extracted: /tmp/DataFetcher.abi (442 lines)
  • Go bindings generated: /tmp/DataFetcher.go (768 lines, 38KB)

Existing Bindings: /home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/bindings/datafetcher/data_fetcher.go

  • Size: 768 lines, 38KB
  • Diff Result: NO DIFFERENCES (files are identical)
$ wc -l data_fetcher.go /tmp/DataFetcher.go
768 data_fetcher.go
768 /tmp/DataFetcher.go
1536 total

$ diff data_fetcher.go /tmp/DataFetcher.go
[No output - files are identical]

Struct Definitions (Both Correct)

DataFetcherBatchResponse:

type DataFetcherBatchResponse struct {
    V2Data      []DataFetcherV2PoolData
    V3Data      []DataFetcherV3PoolData
    BlockNumber *big.Int
    Timestamp   *big.Int
}

DataFetcherV2PoolData:

type DataFetcherV2PoolData struct {
    Pool               common.Address
    Token0             common.Address
    Token1             common.Address
    Reserve0           *big.Int  // uint112
    Reserve1           *big.Int  // uint112
    BlockTimestampLast uint32
    Price0             *big.Int
    Price1             *big.Int
}

DataFetcherV3PoolData:

type DataFetcherV3PoolData struct {
    Pool         common.Address
    Token0       common.Address
    Token1       common.Address
    Fee          *big.Int  // uint24
    SqrtPriceX96 *big.Int  // uint160
    Tick         *big.Int  // int24
    Liquidity    *big.Int  // uint128
    Price0       *big.Int
    Price1       *big.Int
}

Code Usage Analysis

File: pkg/datafetcher/batch_fetcher.go

Correct Usage at Lines 143-147:

// Unpack the result
var response datafetcher.DataFetcherBatchResponse
err = dataFetcherABI.UnpackIntoInterface(&response, "batchFetchAllData", result)
if err != nil {
    return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to unpack response: %w", err)
}

Correct Iteration at Lines 153, 185:

// Process V3 data
for _, v3Data := range response.V3Data {
    // ...
}

// Process V2 data
for _, v2Data := range response.V2Data {
    // ...
}

✅ All usage is correct

🔍 Root Cause Analysis: Why Were There ABI Errors?

The historical logs showed 16,419+ errors like:

abi: cannot unmarshal struct { V2Data []struct {...}; V3Data []struct {...} }
in to []datafetcher.DataFetcherV2PoolData

Analysis: The error message says it's trying to unmarshal the correct structure (BatchResponse with V2Data/V3Data) into a wrong type (array of V2PoolData).

Possible Explanations:

  1. Old Code (Now Fixed) Previous version of the code might have called batchFetchV2Data or batchFetchV3Data (which return arrays) but tried to unmarshal into BatchResponse struct. This code has since been corrected.

  2. Deployed Contract Mismatch The on-chain deployed DataFetcher contract might have a different ABI than the source code. Need to verify deployed contract address and ABI.

  3. Runtime Connection Issues The errors occurred during network instability (WebSocket connection failures), possibly causing partial/corrupted responses.

  4. Error Log Timestamp The 56MB error log contains historical errors from Oct 27-30. The code may have been fixed during that period.

🧪 Build & Runtime Status

Build Status: ✅ SUCCESSFUL

$ make build
Building mev-bot...
Build successful!

Runtime Status: ❌ STARTUP HANG

Bot hangs at WebSocket connection attempts:

Loaded environment variables from .env
Using configuration: config/local.yaml (GO_ENV=development)
Warning: failed to connect to WebSocket endpoint wss://arb1.arbitrum.io/ws:
websocket: bad handshake (HTTP status 404 Not Found)

Primary Blocker: WebSocket connection failures prevent bot from initializing. This is unrelated to the contract bindings.

📁 Contract Functions Available

The DataFetcher contract provides three functions:

1. batchFetchAllData(BatchRequest) -> BatchResponse

Returns: Struct with separate V2Data and V3Data arrays Usage: Current implementation (correct)

2. batchFetchV2Data(address[]) -> V2PoolData[]

Returns: Array of V2 pool data Usage: Not currently used

3. batchFetchV3Data(address[]) -> V3PoolData[]

Returns: Array of V3 pool data Usage: Not currently used

Note: If old code was calling functions #2 or #3 but expecting a BatchResponse, that would cause the reported errors.

✅ Verification Checklist

  • Source contract compiles successfully
  • ABI extracted correctly from compiled contract
  • Go bindings generated with abigen
  • Existing bindings match generated bindings exactly
  • Struct definitions have correct field types
  • Code usage calls correct function (batchFetchAllData)
  • Code unpacks into correct type (BatchResponse)
  • Code iterates over V2Data and V3Data correctly
  • Project builds successfully with existing bindings
  • Bot starts and runs (blocked by WebSocket issues)
  • Deployed contract ABI verified (not checked)

🎯 Recommendations

1. No Bindings Update Required ✅

The existing bindings are correct and match the source contract. No action needed.

2. Resolve WebSocket Connection Issues 🔴 PRIORITY

# Option A: Use HTTP-only mode (disable WebSocket)
export ARBITRUM_WS_ENDPOINT=""

# Option B: Find working WebSocket endpoint
# - Free endpoint wss://arb1.arbitrum.io/ws returns 404
# - Chainstack endpoint returns 403 (expired API key)
# - Need valid endpoint or premium RPC provider

# Option C: Add fallback logic
# Modify connection code to gracefully handle WebSocket failures

3. Verify Deployed Contract 🟡 RECOMMENDED

# Check the deployed DataFetcher contract address
# Verify its ABI matches the source code
# If mismatch found, redeploy contract with correct ABI

4. Archive Historical Error Logs 🟢 OPTIONAL

# The 56MB error log is from Oct 27-30
# Code may have been fixed since then
# Archive old logs to track new errors separately

./scripts/archive-logs.sh
> logs/mev_bot_errors.log  # Start fresh

5. Add Contract ABI Verification 🟢 FUTURE

// In batch_fetcher.go initialization
// Verify deployed contract has expected ABI signature
expectedSignature := "batchFetchAllData((address[],address[]))"
// Check contract supports this function

📈 Testing Once Bot Starts

When WebSocket issues are resolved and bot starts successfully:

1. Verify No ABI Errors

# Watch for ABI unmarshaling errors
tail -f logs/mev_bot_errors.log | grep "unmarshal"

# Expected: No errors (bindings are correct)

2. Verify Pool Data Fetching

# Check batch fetch logs
grep "Batch fetched" logs/mev_bot.log

# Expected: "✅ Batch fetched X/Y pools successfully"

3. Monitor Performance

# Check fetch latency
grep "batch fetch" logs/mev_bot_performance.log

# Expected: <500ms for 100 pools

🔄 Alternative Approaches (If Issues Persist)

Approach 1: Use Individual RPC Calls

If batch fetching still has issues after bot starts:

// Fallback: Fetch pool data individually instead of batching
// Slower but more reliable
for _, poolAddr := range pools {
    poolData, err := fetchIndividual(poolAddr)
    // ...
}

Approach 2: Switch to View Functions

// Use batchFetchV2Data and batchFetchV3Data separately
// These are view functions (read-only) vs nonpayable
v2Data, err := contract.BatchFetchV2Data(opts, v2Pools)
v3Data, err := contract.BatchFetchV3Data(opts, v3Pools)

Approach 3: Deploy New DataFetcher

# Deploy fresh DataFetcher contract with verified ABI
cd /home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha
forge script script/Deploy.s.sol --rpc-url $ARBITRUM_RPC_ENDPOINT --broadcast

# Update contract address in mev-beta config

📊 Summary Table

Component Status Action Required
Source Contract ✅ Compiles None
ABI Extraction ✅ Correct None
Go Bindings ✅ Up to Date None
Code Usage ✅ Correct None
Project Build ✅ Successful None
WebSocket Connection ❌ Failing FIX REQUIRED
Bot Startup ❌ Hangs FIX REQUIRED
Deployed Contract ❓ Unknown Verify recommended

🎓 Key Insights

  1. The bindings were never the problem - They've been correct all along
  2. The error message was misleading - It suggested bindings issue, but actually pointed to old/different code
  3. Code has been refactored correctly - Current implementation uses proper types
  4. Primary blocker is infrastructure - WebSocket connectivity preventing testing
  5. Historical logs are outdated - 56MB of errors from Oct 27-30 may not reflect current code state

🔗 Related Files

  • Source Contract: /home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha/src/core/DataFetcher.sol
  • Contract ABI: /home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha/out/DataFetcher.sol/DataFetcher.json
  • Go Bindings: /home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/bindings/datafetcher/data_fetcher.go
  • Usage Code: /home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/pkg/datafetcher/batch_fetcher.go
  • Test File: /home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/tests/integration/fork_test.go

📞 Next Steps

IMMEDIATE:

  1. Resolve WebSocket connection issues (see Recommendation #2)
  2. Get bot to start successfully

AFTER BOT STARTS:

  1. Monitor for ABI errors (should be zero)
  2. Verify batch fetch works correctly
  3. Archive old error logs

OPTIONAL:

  1. Verify deployed contract ABI
  2. Add ABI verification to initialization
  3. Implement fallback fetch strategies

Document Created: October 30, 2025 21:50 UTC Analysis Time: ~15 minutes Conclusion: ✅ No bindings update needed - focus on WebSocket connectivity

This analysis confirms that the contract bindings regeneration task was based on a misdiagnosis of the root cause. The actual issue is WebSocket connectivity preventing bot startup and testing.

Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink