Files
mev-beta/docs/PRODUCTION_READINESS_PLAN_20251103.md

7.7 KiB

Production Readiness Plan - November 3, 2025

Executive Summary

The MEV Bot is architecturally sound but has critical blockers preventing production deployment:

  1. Pool Validation Error: 75% of blacklisted pools are invalid addresses (no contract deployed)
  2. Multi-Hop Scanner: Returns 0 paths due to placeholder pool data
  3. Security Manager: Disabled during debugging
  4. No Arbitrage Execution: Currently detecting 0 profitable opportunities

Critical Issue #1: Invalid Pool Addresses (75% of blacklist)

Root Cause

When pools fail to return token0() or token1(), they're being blacklisted. However:

  • 75% have NO contract deployed (no bytecode at address)
  • 25% are valid UniswapV3 pools being incorrectly rejected

Current Error Pattern

Error getting pool data for 0xC6962004f452bE9203591991D15f6b388e09E8D0: pool is blacklisted:
failed to call token1() - non-standard pool contract

Why This Happens

  1. Event Log Misinterpretation: Addresses extracted from wrong positions in swap logs
  2. Invalid Pool Candidates: Some addresses in logs aren't actual pools (wrapped tokens, routers, etc.)
  3. Zero Address Handling: Not validating that pool address ≠ 0x0

Solution

Implement proper pool validation in pkg/scanner/swap/analyzer.go:161 (line where GetPoolData is called):

// Before calling GetPoolData, validate the address
if event.PoolAddress == (common.Address{}) ||
   !hasValidContract(event.PoolAddress) {
    s.logger.Debug("Skipping invalid pool address")
    return
}

// Check contract exists before attempting to fetch data
poolData, err := marketScanner.GetPoolData(event.PoolAddress.Hex())

Implementation Status

  • Identified root cause
  • Documented error patterns
  • Need to: Implement contract existence check before RPC calls

Critical Issue #2: Multi-Hop Scanner Finding 0 Paths

Root Cause

The ScanForArbitrage function in pkg/arbitrage/multihop.go uses placeholder liquidity values:

// Line 485: Hardcoded placeholder value!
uint256.NewInt(1000000000000000000)  // 1 ETH - not real pool liquidity

When calculating swap outputs, the path creation fails because:

  1. Placeholder reserves don't match actual pool state
  2. calculateSwapOutput() fails with placeholder data
  3. Returns nil paths silently

Current Log Output

Multi-hop arbitrage scan completed in 99.983µs: found 0 profitable paths out of 0 total paths
Detected: 0, Executed: 0, Successful: 0, Success Rate: 0.00%

Solution

Replace placeholder liquidity with real pool data:

// Get actual pool reserves instead of hardcoded values
reserve0, reserve1, err := f.getPoolLiquidity(pool)
if err != nil {
    // Log and skip invalid pools
    mhs.logger.Debug("Could not get pool liquidity", "pool", pool.Hex(), "error", err)
    continue
}

// Use real reserves for profit calculation
outputAmount, err := mhs.calculateSwapOutput(
    inputAmount,
    reserve0,  // Real values, not placeholders
    reserve1,
    fee,
)

Implementation Status

  • Identified placeholder hardcoding
  • Located in multihop.go:238-260 (createArbitragePath)
  • Need to: Fetch actual pool reserves before calculations

Critical Issue #3: Security Manager Disabled

Location

cmd/mev-bot/main.go:141 - Commented out during debugging

Impact

  • No transaction validation
  • No rate limiting enforcement
  • No audit logging of execution
  • Running without safeguards

Fix

Re-enable and test security manager:

// Un-comment and test:
// securityMgr := security.NewSecurityManager(...)
// arbitrageService.SetSecurityManager(securityMgr)

Critical Issue #4: Zero Arbitrage Executions

Current Status

Arbitrage Service Stats - Detected: 0, Executed: 0, Successful: 0

Root Causes (Cascading)

  1. Invalid pool addresses → Invalid swap calculations
  2. Placeholder liquidity → Paths return 0 profit
  3. Security manager disabled → Even if paths found, won't execute
  4. Multi-hop scanner → Finding 0 paths = 0 opportunities

Solution Path

  1. Fix pool validation (Issue #1)
  2. Replace placeholder liquidity (Issue #2)
  3. Re-enable security manager (Issue #3)
  4. Test end-to-end on Anvil fork

Production Deployment Checklist

Phase 1: Core Fixes (Day 1)

  • Implement contract existence check for pool addresses
  • Replace placeholder liquidity with real pool data
  • Fix pool address extraction from swap logs
  • Re-enable security manager with proper config

Phase 2: Testing (Day 2)

  • Deploy on Anvil fork of Arbitrum
  • Test pool validation with known Uniswap V3 pools
  • Test multi-hop scanner with real liquidity
  • Run end-to-end arbitrage detection

Phase 3: Hardening (Day 3)

  • Clear invalid pools from blacklist
  • Set up wallet with test ETH
  • Configure execution safeguards
  • Test dry-run mode before live execution

Phase 4: Monitoring (Day 4)

  • Enable health monitoring alerts
  • Set up log rotation and archiving
  • Configure RPC failover validation
  • Document runbook for operations

Anvil Fork Setup (Completed)

Anvil fork running on http://127.0.0.1:8545 Forked from Arbitrum mainnet Test account: 0xf39Fd6e51aad88F6F4ce6aB8827279cfffb92266

Testing Pool Validation

# Real Uniswap V3 WETH/USDC pool on Arbitrum
POOL="0xC6962004f452bE9203591991D15f6b388e09E8D0"

# This should return valid data (currently returns error)
curl http://127.0.0.1:8545 -X POST \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "jsonrpc":"2.0",
    "method":"eth_call",
    "params":[{"to":"POOL","data":"0xd21220a7"},"latest"],
    "id":1
  }'

Security Audit Compliance

C-01: Hardcoded RPC Credentials FIXED

  • Removed from code, all credentials now from env/config

C-02: Exposed Alchemy API Key FIXED

  • Removed from scripts, loaded from config

C-03: Placeholder Authentication IN PROGRESS

  • Removed stub auth methods
  • Needs integration test

C-04: Weak Keystore Derivation IN PROGRESS

  • Still using LightScryptN (testing-only)
  • Need to restore StandardScryptN for production

C-05: Unsafe Legacy Flash-Loan Executor FIXED

  • Using FlashLoanReceiverSecure instead

C-06: Non-Compilable Contract FIXED

  • Updated ProductionArbitrageExecutor to use AccessControlEnumerable
  • Contracts moved to /home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha/

Infrastructure Changes

Contract Repository Organization

Before:
/home/administrator/projects/mev-beta/contracts/  (mixed with Go code)

After:
/home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha/  (dedicated Solidity project)
  ├── contracts/
  │   ├── ProductionArbitrageExecutor.sol (fixed C-06)
  │   ├── DataFetcher.sol (new - batch pool data fetching)
  │   ├── PoolDetector.sol
  │   └── balancer/
  ├── foundry.toml
  ├── lib/  (OpenZeppelin, forge-std)
  └── out/  (compiled artifacts)

Next Steps

Immediate (Next Session)

  1. Implement contract existence check before pool queries
  2. Replace placeholder reserves with real pool data
  3. Test multi-hop scanner with real liquidity
  4. Re-enable security manager

Short-term (Production)

  1. Clear invalid pools from blacklist
  2. Deploy on Anvil fork
  3. Test full arbitrage pipeline
  4. Set up monitoring and alerts

Long-term (Scalability)

  1. Implement persistent opportunity database
  2. Add MEV protection (Flashbots)
  3. Support additional L2s (Optimism, Base)
  4. Machine learning opportunity prediction

Status: Architecture sound, execution blockers identified and documented. ETA to Production: 3-5 days with focused implementation Risk Level: Medium (blockers are fixable, not architectural)