copper-tone-tech/mev-beta
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 7 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
015a196de95ad802de2f5085e16a3d9ea7767a85
mev-beta/docs/COMPREHENSIVE_100_POINT_AUDIT.md
Krypto Kajun c7142ef671 fix(critical): fix empty token graph + aggressive settings for 24h execution 
CRITICAL BUG FIX:
- MultiHopScanner.updateTokenGraph() was EMPTY - adding no pools!
- Result: Token graph had 0 pools, found 0 arbitrage paths
- All opportunities showed estimatedProfitETH: 0.000000

FIX APPLIED:
- Populated token graph with 8 high-liquidity Arbitrum pools:
  * WETH/USDC (0.05% and 0.3% fees)
  * USDC/USDC.e (0.01% - common arbitrage)
  * ARB/USDC, WETH/ARB, WETH/USDT
  * WBTC/WETH, LINK/WETH
- These are REAL verified pool addresses with high volume

AGGRESSIVE THRESHOLD CHANGES:
- Min profit: 0.0001 ETH → 0.00001 ETH (10x lower, ~$0.02)
- Min ROI: 0.05% → 0.01% (5x lower)
- Gas multiplier: 5x → 1.5x (3.3x lower safety margin)
- Max slippage: 3% → 5% (67% higher tolerance)
- Max paths: 100 → 200 (more thorough scanning)
- Cache expiry: 2min → 30sec (fresher opportunities)

EXPECTED RESULTS (24h):
- 20-50 opportunities with profit > $0.02 (was 0)
- 5-15 execution attempts (was 0)
- 1-2 successful executions (was 0)
- $0.02-$0.20 net profit (was $0)

WARNING: Aggressive settings may result in some losses
Monitor closely for first 6 hours and adjust if needed

Target: First profitable execution within 24 hours

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-29 04:18:27 -05:00

774 lines
25 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

# MEV Bot - Comprehensive 100-Point Security & Production Audit
**Date**: 2025-10-26
**Version**: 1.0
**Auditor**: Claude Code
**Project**: MEV Beta (mev-beta + Mev-Alpha)
**Status**: In Progress
---
## Audit Scoring System
- ✅ **PASS**: Meets requirement fully
- ⚠️ **WARN**: Partial compliance, needs attention
- ❌ **FAIL**: Does not meet requirement, critical issue
- 🔄 **IN PROGRESS**: Currently being addressed
- ⏸️ **NOT APPLICABLE**: Not relevant to current deployment
**Target Score**: 90/100 (90% for production readiness)
---
## Section 1: Smart Contract Security (Solidity) - 25 Points
### 1.1 Access Control (5 points)
- [ ] **1.1.1** All sensitive functions have appropriate access modifiers (onlyOwner, onlyAuthorized)
- Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:25-28`, `src/core/BaseFlashSwapper.sol:51-54`
- Status: ⏸️ Requires manual verification
- Action: Review all external/public functions
- [ ] **1.1.2** Owner privileges can be transferred securely (2-step ownership transfer)
- Location: Uses OpenZeppelin Ownable2Step pattern
- Status: ⏸️ Check if Ownable2Step is used
- Action: Verify inheritance chain
- [ ] **1.1.3** Critical operations have multi-signature requirements or timelocks
- Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:288` (EMERGENCY_TIMELOCK = 48 hours)
- Status: ⏸️ Verify timelock implementation
- Action: Test emergency withdrawal timelock
- [ ] **1.1.4** No functions allow arbitrary external calls without validation
- Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:193-223` (swap execution with selector validation)
- Status: ⏸️ Requires code review
- Action: Audit all `.call()` usage
- [ ] **1.1.5** Role-based access control properly implemented for multi-user scenarios
- Location: `authorizedCallers`, `authorizedDEXes` mappings
- Status: ⏸️ Verify authorization checks
- Action: Test unauthorized access attempts
### 1.2 Reentrancy Protection (5 points)
- [ ] **1.2.1** All state-changing external functions use ReentrancyGuard
- Location: `ArbitrageExecutor`, `BaseFlashSwapper` inherit `ReentrancyGuard`
- Status: ⏸️ Verify all external functions
- Action: Grep for `external.*{` and check modifiers
- [ ] **1.2.2** Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern followed consistently
- Location: All swap execution functions
- Status: ⏸️ Manual code review required
- Action: Review state changes before external calls
- [ ] **1.2.3** No recursive external calls to untrusted contracts
- Location: DEX interactions
- Status: ⏸️ Review call flow
- Action: Map all external call chains
- [ ] **1.2.4** Flash loan callback validation prevents unauthorized callbacks
- Location: `src/dex/UniswapV3FlashSwapper.sol:87-149` (uniswapV3FlashCallback)
- Status: ⏸️ Verify pool validation
- Action: Test with fake pool contracts
- [ ] **1.2.5** Reentrancy protection doesn't have gas inefficiencies
- Location: OpenZeppelin ReentrancyGuard implementation
- Status: ⏸️ Gas profiling needed
- Action: Benchmark with/without guard
### 1.3 Input Validation (5 points)
- [ ] **1.3.1** All array lengths are validated before iteration
- Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:100-102` (token/pool length checks)
- Status: ⏸️ Check all array operations
- Action: Search for `.length` usage
- [ ] **1.3.2** Address parameters validated against zero address
- Location: Multiple locations (constructor validation)
- Status: ⏸️ Comprehensive check needed
- Action: Grep for `address.*{` and verify checks
- [ ] **1.3.3** Numeric parameters have range validation (min/max bounds)
- Location: `src/dex/UniswapV3FlashSwapper.sol:62` (uint128 max check)
- Status: ⏸️ Check all numeric inputs
- Action: Review for overflow/underflow risks
- [ ] **1.3.4** Function selector validation prevents arbitrary function calls
- Location: `src/core/ArbitrageExecutor.sol:42-59` (allowedSwapSelectors)
- Status: ⏸️ Verify whitelist completeness
- Action: Test with invalid selectors
- [ ] **1.3.5** Deadline parameters prevent stale transaction execution
- Location: Multiple functions use `deadline` parameter
- Status: ⏸️ Verify enforcement
- Action: Test with expired deadlines
### 1.4 Integer Arithmetic Safety (5 points)
- [ ] **1.4.1** Solidity 0.8.x automatic overflow protection utilized
- Location: `pragma solidity ^0.8.19`
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - Using 0.8.19
- Action: None required
- [ ] **1.4.2** Unchecked blocks only used where overflow is impossible
- Location: Search for `unchecked {` blocks
- Status: ⏸️ Review each unchecked block
- Action: Justify each unchecked usage
- [ ] **1.4.3** Division by zero checks in place
- Location: DEXMath library, price calculations
- Status: ⏸️ Check all division operations
- Action: Test with zero denominators
- [ ] **1.4.4** Precision loss in calculations minimized
- Location: Price calculations, liquidity math
- Status: ⏸️ Review calculation order
- Action: Test with extreme values
- [ ] **1.4.5** No unsafe type conversions (e.g., uint256 to uint128)
- Location: Flash swap amount validations
- Status: ⏸️ Audit all type casts
- Action: Search for `uint.*\(.*\)` patterns
### 1.5 External Dependencies (5 points)
- [ ] **1.5.1** OpenZeppelin contracts at latest stable version
- Location: Check package dependencies
- Status: ⏸️ Verify versions
- Action: `forge update` and check versions
- [ ] **1.5.2** Uniswap V2/V3 interfaces match deployed contracts
- Location: Interface definitions
- Status: ⏸️ Compare with on-chain ABIs
- Action: Fetch ABIs from Arbiscan and compare
- [ ] **1.5.3** No outdated or vulnerable dependencies
- Location: All imports
- Status: ⏸️ Security scan needed
- Action: Run `forge audit` / `slither`
- [ ] **1.5.4** Custom interfaces properly implement expected standards
- Location: IArbitrage, IFlashSwapper
- Status: ⏸️ Verify ERC165 compliance
- Action: Test supportsInterface()
- [ ] **1.5.5** DEX protocol assumptions documented and validated
- Location: README, inline comments
- Status: ⏸️ Documentation review
- Action: Document all DEX assumptions
---
## Section 2: Go Code Security & Quality - 20 Points
### 2.1 Input Validation (4 points)
- [ ] **2.1.1** All RPC responses validated before processing
- Location: `pkg/arbitrum/abi_decoder.go`, `pkg/uniswap/contracts.go`
- Status: ⏸️ Review validation logic
- Action: Test with malformed RPC responses
- [ ] **2.1.2** Transaction data validated before signing
- Location: Transaction building logic
- Status: ⏸️ Review signing workflow
- Action: Test with invalid transaction data
- [ ] **2.1.3** Configuration files validated on startup
- Location: `internal/config`
- Status: ⏸️ Check config validation
- Action: Test with invalid config files
- [ ] **2.1.4** Environment variables sanitized and validated
- Location: Config loading
- Status: ⏸️ Review env var handling
- Action: Test with missing/invalid env vars
### 2.2 Error Handling (4 points)
- [ ] **2.2.1** All errors properly wrapped with context
- Location: Throughout codebase
- Status: ⏸️ Audit error handling
- Action: Search for `return err` without wrapping
- [ ] **2.2.2** Panics are recovered and logged appropriately
- Location: Main goroutines
- Status: ⏸️ Check panic recovery
- Action: Search for `defer recover()`
- [ ] **2.2.3** Critical errors trigger alerts/notifications
- Location: Error handling logic
- Status: ⏸️ Review alerting system
- Action: Verify alert configuration
- [ ] **2.2.4** Retry logic with exponential backoff for transient failures
- Location: RPC client, transaction submission
- Status: ⏸️ Review retry mechanisms
- Action: Test with intermittent failures
### 2.3 Concurrency Safety (4 points)
- [ ] **2.3.1** No data races (verified with -race flag)
- Location: All concurrent code
- Status: ⏸️ Run race detector
- Action: `go test -race ./...`
- [ ] **2.3.2** Proper mutex usage for shared state
- Location: Cache implementations, shared maps
- Status: ⏸️ Review mutex patterns
- Action: Audit all `sync.Mutex` usage
- [ ] **2.3.3** Channels used correctly (no deadlocks)
- Location: Event processing pipelines
- Status: ⏸️ Test channel operations
- Action: Stress test with high load
- [ ] **2.3.4** Goroutine leaks prevented (proper cleanup)
- Location: All goroutine launches
- Status: ⏸️ Profile goroutines
- Action: Use pprof to detect leaks
### 2.4 Cryptographic Security (4 points)
- [ ] **2.4.1** Private keys never logged or exposed
- Location: All logging statements
- Status: ⏸️ Audit logs
- Action: Grep logs for sensitive data
- [ ] **2.4.2** Secure key storage (encrypted, not in code)
- Location: Key management
- Status: ⏸️ Review key storage
- Action: Verify encryption at rest
- [ ] **2.4.3** Random number generation uses crypto/rand
- Location: Nonce generation, if any
- Status: ⏸️ Check RNG usage
- Action: Search for `math/rand` usage
- [ ] **2.4.4** Transaction signing uses proper nonce management
- Location: Transaction builder
- Status: ⏸️ Review nonce tracking
- Action: Test concurrent transaction signing
### 2.5 Resource Management (4 points)
- [ ] **2.5.1** Database connections properly pooled and closed
- Location: Database client initialization
- Status: ⏸️ Review connection management
- Action: Check for connection leaks
- [ ] **2.5.2** File descriptors closed after use
- Location: All file operations
- Status: ⏸️ Audit file handling
- Action: Check `defer file.Close()` usage
- [ ] **2.5.3** Memory usage monitored and bounded
- Location: Large data structures, caches
- Status: ⏸️ Profile memory usage
- Action: Run `go tool pprof` heap analysis
- [ ] **2.5.4** Graceful shutdown implemented for all services
- Location: Main application, signal handling
- Status: ⏸️ Test shutdown sequence
- Action: Send SIGTERM and verify cleanup
---
## Section 3: Contract Binding Consistency - 15 Points
### 3.1 Binding Generation (3 points)
- [x] **3.1.1** Bindings generated from latest compiled contracts
- Location: `bindings/` directory
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - Generated from Mev-Alpha contracts
- Action: None
- [x] **3.1.2** Binding generation script exists and is automated
- Location: `scripts/generate-bindings.sh`
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - Script created and tested
- Action: None
- [ ] **3.1.3** Generated bindings compile without errors
- Location: `go build ./bindings/...`
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - Verified compilation
- Action: Add to CI/CD pipeline
### 3.2 Binding Usage (6 points)
- [ ] **3.2.1** All contract calls use generated bindings (not raw ABI)
- Location: `pkg/uniswap/contracts.go`, others
- Status: ⚠️ **WARN** - Some files still use manual ABI
- Action: Refactor 17 files identified in audit
- [ ] **3.2.2** Function signatures match deployed contract ABIs
- Location: All binding usage
- Status: ⏸️ Compare with on-chain ABIs
- Action: Verify against Arbiscan
- [ ] **3.2.3** Event parsing uses binding-generated methods
- Location: `pkg/events/parser.go`
- Status: ⚠️ **WARN** - Uses manual event parsing
- Action: Refactor to use binding events
- [ ] **3.2.4** Type conversions handled correctly (big.Int, addresses)
- Location: All binding usage
- Status: ⏸️ Review type handling
- Action: Test with extreme values
- [ ] **3.2.5** Error handling for contract calls is comprehensive
- Location: All contract interaction code
- Status: ⏸️ Audit error handling
- Action: Test with reverted transactions
- [ ] **3.2.6** Contract addresses centralized and version-tracked
- Location: `bindings/addresses.go`
- Status: ⚠️ **WARN** - Addresses set to zero (not deployed)
- Action: Update after deployment
### 3.3 Binding Testing (3 points)
- [ ] **3.3.1** Integration tests verify binding functionality
- Location: `tests/integration/fork_test.go`
- Status: 🔄 **IN PROGRESS** - Tests created, not run
- Action: Execute fork tests
- [ ] **3.3.2** Binding calls tested against fork environment
- Location: Integration test suite
- Status: 🔄 **IN PROGRESS** - Framework ready
- Action: Run tests
- [ ] **3.3.3** ABI compatibility verified with deployed contracts
- Location: Test suite
- Status: ⏸️ Deploy and verify
- Action: Compare ABIs post-deployment
### 3.4 Documentation (3 points)
- [x] **3.4.1** Binding usage patterns documented
- Location: `docs/BINDING_CONSISTENCY_GUIDE.md`
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - Comprehensive guide created
- Action: None
- [x] **3.4.2** Migration guide for manual ABI to bindings exists
- Location: `TODO_BINDING_MIGRATION.md`
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - Detailed roadmap created
- Action: Execute migration
- [x] **3.4.3** Contract deployment addresses documented
- Location: `bindings/addresses.go`, deployment docs
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - Structure in place
- Action: Update after deployment
---
## Section 4: Testing Coverage - 15 Points
### 4.1 Unit Testing (5 points)
- [ ] **4.1.1** Solidity unit test coverage >80%
- Location: `test/unit/` directory
- Status: ⏸️ Measure coverage
- Action: `forge coverage`
- [ ] **4.1.2** Go unit test coverage >80%
- Location: `pkg/` test files
- Status: ⏸️ Measure coverage
- Action: `go test -cover ./...`
- [ ] **4.1.3** Critical functions have edge case tests
- Location: Math libraries, ABI decoders
- Status: ⏸️ Review test cases
- Action: Add boundary tests
- [ ] **4.1.4** Mock contracts used for isolated testing
- Location: `test/mocks/`
- Status: ⏸️ Verify mock completeness
- Action: Review mock implementations
- [ ] **4.1.5** Test data includes realistic mainnet scenarios
- Location: Test fixtures
- Status: ⏸️ Review test data
- Action: Add real transaction examples
### 4.2 Integration Testing (5 points)
- [ ] **4.2.1** Fork tests validate contract deployments
- Location: `script/DeployAndTest.s.sol`
- Status: 🔄 **IN PROGRESS** - Script created
- Action: Execute on Arbitrum fork
- [ ] **4.2.2** End-to-end arbitrage flow tested
- Location: `tests/integration/fork_test.go`
- Status: 🔄 **IN PROGRESS** - Tests written
- Action: Execute tests
- [ ] **4.2.3** Multi-DEX interactions tested
- Location: Integration tests
- Status: ⏸️ Create tests
- Action: Test Uniswap, Sushiswap, Camelot
- [ ] **4.2.4** Flash loan execution tested end-to-end
- Location: Flash swap tests
- Status: ⏸️ Create comprehensive tests
- Action: Test all flash swap paths
- [ ] **4.2.5** Error conditions tested (reverts, failures)
- Location: All test suites
- Status: ⏸️ Add negative tests
- Action: Test failure scenarios
### 4.3 Performance Testing (3 points)
- [ ] **4.3.1** Gas usage profiled and optimized
- Location: Solidity contracts
- Status: ⏸️ Profile gas usage
- Action: `forge snapshot` and analyze
- [ ] **4.3.2** Transaction throughput benchmarked
- Location: Go bot processing
- Status: ⏸️ Benchmark processing speed
- Action: Measure TPS handling
- [ ] **4.3.3** Memory usage profiled under load
- Location: Go application
- Status: ⏸️ Profile memory
- Action: `go tool pprof` under load
### 4.4 Security Testing (2 points)
- [ ] **4.4.1** Static analysis tools run (Slither, GoSec)
- Location: CI/CD pipeline
- Status: ⏸️ Run security scanners
- Action: `slither .` and `gosec ./...`
- [ ] **4.4.2** Fuzzing tests for critical functions
- Location: Solidity and Go
- Status: ⏸️ Implement fuzzing
- Action: Use Foundry fuzzing and go-fuzz
---
## Section 5: Deployment Readiness - 10 Points
### 5.1 Infrastructure (3 points)
- [ ] **5.1.1** RPC endpoints configured with failover
- Location: `pkg/arbitrum/connection.go`
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - Multi-endpoint support implemented
- Action: Test failover mechanism
- [ ] **5.1.2** Rate limiting configured appropriately
- Location: `internal/ratelimit/`
- Status: ⏸️ Review rate limits
- Action: Test against RPC limits
- [ ] **5.1.3** Monitoring and alerting configured
- Location: Metrics collection
- Status: ⏸️ Setup monitoring
- Action: Configure Prometheus/Grafana
### 5.2 Configuration Management (3 points)
- [ ] **5.2.1** Production config separate from dev/test
- Location: `config/` directory
- Status: ⏸️ Verify separation
- Action: Create production configs
- [ ] **5.2.2** Secrets managed securely (not in repo)
- Location: `.env` files, secret management
- Status: ⏸️ Audit secret storage
- Action: Use vault or secret manager
- [ ] **5.2.3** Configuration validation on startup
- Location: Config loader
- Status: ⏸️ Test validation
- Action: Test with invalid configs
### 5.3 Operational Procedures (4 points)
- [ ] **5.3.1** Deployment runbook documented
- Location: Deployment documentation
- Status: ⏸️ Create runbook
- Action: Document step-by-step deployment
- [ ] **5.3.2** Rollback procedure documented and tested
- Location: Operational docs
- Status: ⏸️ Create rollback plan
- Action: Test rollback procedure
- [ ] **5.3.3** Emergency shutdown procedure defined
- Location: Operational docs
- Status: ⏸️ Document emergency procedures
- Action: Create shutdown checklist
- [ ] **5.3.4** On-call rotation and escalation defined
- Location: Operational docs
- Status: ⏸️ Define on-call process
- Action: Create escalation matrix
---
## Section 6: Operational Security - 10 Points
### 6.1 Key Management (3 points)
- [ ] **6.1.1** Private keys encrypted at rest
- Location: Key storage
- Status: ⏸️ Verify encryption
- Action: Test key encryption
- [ ] **6.1.2** Hardware wallet support for production keys
- Location: Signing logic
- Status: ⏸️ Implement HSM/hardware wallet
- Action: Integrate Ledger/Trezor support
- [ ] **6.1.3** Key rotation procedure documented
- Location: Security docs
- Status: ⏸️ Create key rotation plan
- Action: Document rotation steps
### 6.2 Access Control (3 points)
- [ ] **6.2.1** Production server access restricted
- Location: Infrastructure
- Status: ⏸️ Configure access controls
- Action: Setup IAM/SSH restrictions
- [ ] **6.2.2** Audit logging for all privileged operations
- Location: Logging system
- Status: ⏸️ Implement audit logs
- Action: Log all admin operations
- [ ] **6.2.3** Multi-factor authentication required
- Location: Access systems
- Status: ⏸️ Enable MFA
- Action: Enforce MFA for all access
### 6.3 Monitoring (4 points)
- [ ] **6.3.1** Real-time transaction monitoring
- Location: Monitoring dashboard
- Status: ⏸️ Setup monitoring
- Action: Create transaction dashboard
- [ ] **6.3.2** Anomaly detection for unusual activity
- Location: Alerting system
- Status: ⏸️ Configure anomaly detection
- Action: Define normal behavior baselines
- [ ] **6.3.3** Balance monitoring and alerts
- Location: Wallet monitoring
- Status: ⏸️ Setup balance alerts
- Action: Alert on unexpected balance changes
- [ ] **6.3.4** Performance metrics tracked (latency, throughput)
- Location: Metrics system
- Status: ⏸️ Collect metrics
- Action: Setup Prometheus metrics
---
## Section 7: Code Quality - 5 Points
### 7.1 Style & Standards (2 points)
- [ ] **7.1.1** Code follows project style guidelines
- Location: All code files
- Status: ⏸️ Run linters
- Action: `golangci-lint run`, `forge fmt`
- [ ] **7.1.2** No critical linter warnings
- Location: Lint reports
- Status: ⏸️ Fix lint issues
- Action: Address all critical warnings
### 7.2 Documentation (2 points)
- [ ] **7.2.1** All public functions documented
- Location: All packages
- Status: ⏸️ Review documentation
- Action: Add missing docstrings
- [ ] **7.2.2** Complex logic has inline comments
- Location: Math calculations, algorithms
- Status: ⏸️ Review comments
- Action: Add explanatory comments
### 7.3 Maintainability (1 point)
- [ ] **7.3.1** No files >500 lines (modular design)
- Location: All source files
- Status: ⏸️ Check file sizes
- Action: Refactor large files
---
## Section 8: Performance & Scalability - 5 Points
### 8.1 Efficiency (3 points)
- [ ] **8.1.1** Transaction processing <100ms average
- Location: Processing pipeline
- Status: ⏸️ Benchmark performance
- Action: Measure end-to-end latency
- [ ] **8.1.2** Memory footprint <2GB under normal load
- Location: Application runtime
- Status: ⏸️ Profile memory
- Action: Monitor memory usage
- [ ] **8.1.3** No obvious performance bottlenecks
- Location: All code paths
- Status: ⏸️ Profile code
- Action: Use pprof to find bottlenecks
### 8.2 Scalability (2 points)
- [ ] **8.2.1** Can handle 1000+ transactions per second
- Location: Processing pipeline
- Status: ⏸️ Load test
- Action: Stress test with high volume
- [ ] **8.2.2** Horizontally scalable architecture
- Location: System design
- Status: ⏸️ Review architecture
- Action: Document scaling approach
---
## Section 9: Risk Management - 5 Points
### 9.1 Financial Risks (3 points)
- [ ] **9.1.1** Maximum loss per transaction limited
- Location: Execution logic
- Status: ⏸️ Implement loss limits
- Action: Add max loss checks
- [ ] **9.1.2** Daily loss limits enforced
- Location: Risk management
- Status: ⏸️ Implement daily limits
- Action: Track daily P&L
- [ ] **9.1.3** Slippage protection configured
- Location: Trade execution
- Status: ✅ **PASS** - MinProfit parameter exists
- Action: Test slippage scenarios
### 9.2 Operational Risks (2 points)
- [ ] **9.2.1** Circuit breaker for repeated failures
- Location: Execution logic
- Status: ⏸️ Implement circuit breaker
- Action: Add failure threshold checks
- [ ] **9.2.2** Automated trading can be paused/stopped
- Location: Main control loop
- Status: ⏸️ Add pause mechanism
- Action: Implement emergency stop
---
## Audit Execution Commands
### Run Automated Checks
```bash
# Solidity Security
cd /home/administrator/projects/Mev-Alpha
slither .
forge test --gas-report
forge coverage
# Go Security
cd /home/administrator/projects/mev-beta
gosec ./...
go test -race ./...
go test -cover ./...
golangci-lint run
# Performance
go test -bench=. -benchmem ./...
go tool pprof -http=:8080 cpu.prof
# Integration Tests
forge script script/DeployAndTest.s.sol --fork-url $ARBITRUM_RPC_ENDPOINT -vvvv
go test ./tests/integration -v -timeout 30m
```
### Manual Review Checklist
- [ ] Review all `// TODO` comments
- [ ] Review all `// FIXME` comments
- [ ] Review all `// HACK` comments
- [ ] Check for hardcoded addresses
- [ ] Check for hardcoded private keys
- [ ] Review all `panic()` calls
- [ ] Review all unchecked type conversions
- [ ] Review all external calls
---
## Current Score Estimation
Based on information available:
| Category | Points Possible | Est. Score | % |
|----------|----------------|------------|---|
| 1. Smart Contract Security | 25 | 15 | 60% |
| 2. Go Code Security | 20 | 12 | 60% |
| 3. Contract Bindings | 15 | 12 | 80% |
| 4. Testing Coverage | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 5. Deployment Readiness | 10 | 3 | 30% |
| 6. Operational Security | 10 | 2 | 20% |
| 7. Code Quality | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| 8. Performance | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| 9. Risk Management | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| **TOTAL** | **100** | **57** | **57%** |
**Current Status**: ⚠️ **DEVELOPMENT STAGE** - Not production ready
**Required for Production**: 90/100 (90%)
**Gap**: 33 points
---
## Priority Recommendations
### Critical (Complete Before Production)
1. **Run comprehensive security audit** (Slither, GoSec, manual review)
2. **Execute all integration tests** on Arbitrum fork
3. **Implement operational monitoring** (Prometheus, Grafana)
4. **Setup key management** (hardware wallet integration)
5. **Complete contract deployment** and verify on Arbitrum
6. **Implement circuit breakers** and loss limits
7. **Create operational runbooks** (deployment, rollback, emergency)
### High Priority (Complete Within 1 Week)
8. **Achieve 80%+ test coverage** (Solidity and Go)
9. **Refactor manual ABI usage** to use bindings
10. **Performance profiling** and optimization
11. **Setup monitoring and alerting**
12. **Document all procedures**
### Medium Priority (Complete Within 1 Month)
13. **Implement fuzzing tests**
14. **Setup CI/CD pipeline**
15. **Create disaster recovery plan**
16. **Conduct load testing**
---
## Next Steps
1. **Execute automated audit tools** (see commands above)
2. **Run fork deployment test** (`forge script script/DeployAndTest.s.sol`)
3. **Complete integration test suite**
4. **Address all ❌ FAIL and ⚠️ WARN items**
5. **Re-run audit to achieve 90/100 score**
**Audit Report Generated**: 2025-10-26
**Next Review Date**: After critical items completed
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink